The condition is not correct: for example, let
$$f(x) = -2$$
$$g(x) = -8$$
Then, when $x=1$, which satisfies $x>0$, we get
$$\sqrt{f(x)g(x) }= \sqrt{-2 \cdot -8} = \sqrt{16} = 4$$
but
$$\sqrt{f(x)}\sqrt{g(x)} = \sqrt{-2}\sqrt{-8} = \left(i\sqrt{2} \right)\left(i\sqrt{8}\right)= -4$$
assuming principal square roots, as opposed to $-i\sqrt{2}$ and $-i\sqrt{8}$
For what it's worth, I put in the same query and got the same erroneous result:

Alternate form assuming $x>0$: $\sqrt{f(x)}\sqrt{g(x)}$ is always equal to $\sqrt{f(x)g(x)}$
It's probably a bug in Wolfram|Alpha.
As Michael Hardy has pointed out, if $f(x) \geq 0$ and $g(x) \geq 0$, then it is always true that $$\sqrt{f(x)}\sqrt{g(x)} = \sqrt{f(x) g(x)}$$
I think it's likely that this positive-radicand case is what Wolfram|Alpha is intended to output for the "alternate form" section.
Wolfram Alpha suggests that ...Please quote what you literally typed into WA. – dxiv Aug 26 '17 at 03:59Is (f(x)^(1/2)*g(x)^(1/2)) = ((f(x)*g(x))^(1/2)) ?the WA answer I see is "$\sqrt{f(x)} \sqrt{g(x)}$ is not always equal to $\sqrt{f(x) g(x)}$" which is not the same as what you quoted. – dxiv Aug 26 '17 at 04:03