To prove that $\theta$ is continuous, the idea is to convert the geometric description given into a formula for $\theta$, and then to apply that formula. You'll be using what you know from calculus and analytic geometry, with a bit of topology, to prove that $\theta$ is continuous (so it's not algebraic topology that you use to prove continuity).
But, there is a twist: the formula will be in two pieces, corresponding to the two pieces in the expression
$$A = (E^2 \times 0) \cup (S^1 \times I)
$$
So, the outline for the proof goes like this:
- Write down set theoretic formulas for decomposing the domain $X$ into two parts $X = X_1 \cup X_2$, such that
$$X_1 = \theta^{-1}(E^2 \times 0)
$$
and
$$X_2 = \theta^{-1}(S^1 \times I)
$$
- Write down formulas for $\theta | X_1$ and $\theta | X_2$. These should be ordinary formulas which you can verify continuity of, using ordinary tools of calculus.
- To prove continuity of $\theta$ itself, apply the pasting lemma: verify that $X_1 \cap X_2$ is closed, and that the formulas for $\theta | X_1$ and $\theta | X_2$ agree on the intersection $X_1 \cap X_2$, and you are done.
Carrying out steps 1 and 2 requires good analytic geometry skills. I'll get you started by carrying out steps 1 and 2 for $X_1$, leaving you to try $X_2$ (which is harder).
The set $X_1$ is a frustum, obtained by starting with the solid circular cone having base $E^2 \times 0$ and apex $(0,0,2)$, and then intersecting that cone with the solid cylinder $E^2 \times I$. You can write it as
$$X_1 = \{(x,y,z)\quad \,|\,\quad x^2 + y^2 \le \left(1-\frac{z}{2}\right)^2 \quad\text{and}\quad 0 \le z \le 1 \}
$$
To get the formula for $\theta(x,y,z)$ when $(x,y,z) \in X_1$, take the ray from $(0,0,2)$ through $(x,y,z)$, and intersect that ray with $E^2 \times \{0\}$. You get
$$\theta(x,y,z) = (0,0,2) + \frac{2}{2-z}\bigl((x,y,z)-(0,0,2)\bigr) = \bigl(\frac{2x}{2-z},\frac{2y}{2-z},0\bigr)
$$
Since the plane $z=2$ is disjoint from the set $X_1$, this formula shows that $\theta | X_1$ is continuous. (You might also want to verify that this formula has image in $E^2 \times 0$ when $(x,y,z) \in X_1$).
Here, very briefly, are some portions of steps 1 and 2 of $X_2$. The set $X_2$ is the closure of the complement of frustrum $X_1$ inside the cylinder $E^2 \times I$, and so
$$X_2 = \{(x,y,z) \quad \,|\, \quad (1-\frac{z}{2})^2 \le x^2 + y^2 \le 1 \quad\text{and}\quad 0 \le z \le 1\}
$$
The formula for $\theta(x,y,z)$ will instead be obtained by taking the ray from $(0,0,2)$ through $(x,y,z)$ and intersecting with the cylindrical surface $S^1 \times I$.
Finally, you should be able to write down the set theoretic formula for $X_1 \cap X_2$ and verify that it is a closed set, and that the two parts of the formula for $\theta$ give the same outcome for $(x,y,z) \in X_1 \cap X_2$.