Consider a 2-dimensional domain $\mathcal{D}$ (a subset of $\mathbb{R}^2$) and a function which maps points from that region to some height ($f: \mathcal{D} \to \mathbb{R}$). Now consider the double integral
$$\int\int_{\mathcal{D}} f(x,y) dx dy \tag{1}$$
Question
If I remove an arbitrary 1-dimensional curve $c(t) = (x(t), y(t))$ from the region $\mathcal{D}$ such that $\mathcal{D}'$ includes all the points from $\mathcal{D}$ except those on that curve $c(t)$, then would the double integral
$$\int\int_{\mathcal{D}\;'} f(x,y)dxdy$$ evaluate to the same result as equation $(1)$? I would suspect that the answer is yes. Double integrals calculate volume. The line integral over the curve $c(t)$ would give an area. Removing this area would not affect the volume, just as removing a point from a one-dimensional domain does not affect the area of $\int f dx$. Is this correct? (Motivation: I'm thinking about some introductory physics in more detail. I'm dealing with a 2-dimensional object, but then the object is cut into pieces, or ruptures into fragments for whatever reason. I'm not modeling the object discretely, but as a continuum. I'm worrying about the "points lost" on the boundaries of each shattered fragment in my equations - and what that would mean physically. But since I'm taking the philosophy of continuum mechanics, I need to better understand "continuous mathematics" or maybe topology. On the boundary points, there is mass there. But then it kind of gets lost. Or doesn't affect the math.)