I would like to know if this is correct.
Asked
Active
Viewed 54 times
0
-
You have to specify that $\alpha, \beta$ are sets of formulas. – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Apr 24 '18 at 11:21
-
1But the answer is : NO. – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Apr 24 '18 at 11:23
-
@MauroALLEGRANZA Could I know why it is not correct? For example, if $\alpha$ is included in a set, and $\beta$ included in the same set, then the intersection is also included. – IliassA Apr 24 '18 at 11:30
1 Answers
5
Consider the following example :
$A = \{ p \land q \}$ and $B = \{ q \land r \}$.
We have $A \vdash q$ and $B \vdash q$.
But $A \cap B = \emptyset$ and :
$\emptyset \nvdash q$,
because $q$ is not a tautology.
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
- 94,169
-
But, isn't the $\emptyset$ included in all sets, which means $\emptyset \vdash $ any possible set? – IliassA Apr 24 '18 at 11:36
-
-
@IliassA - Yes, $\emptyset$ is included in evry set but this does not mean that every set will prove every formula. – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Apr 24 '18 at 12:03
-