$\newcommand{\bbx}[1]{\,\bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{\displaystyle{#1}}\,}
\newcommand{\braces}[1]{\left\lbrace\,{#1}\,\right\rbrace}
\newcommand{\bracks}[1]{\left\lbrack\,{#1}\,\right\rbrack}
\newcommand{\dd}{\mathrm{d}}
\newcommand{\ds}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}}
\newcommand{\expo}[1]{\,\mathrm{e}^{#1}\,}
\newcommand{\ic}{\mathrm{i}}
\newcommand{\mc}[1]{\mathcal{#1}}
\newcommand{\mrm}[1]{\mathrm{#1}}
\newcommand{\pars}[1]{\left(\,{#1}\,\right)}
\newcommand{\partiald}[3][]{\frac{\partial^{#1} #2}{\partial #3^{#1}}}
\newcommand{\root}[2][]{\,\sqrt[#1]{\,{#2}\,}\,}
\newcommand{\totald}[3][]{\frac{\mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{\mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
\newcommand{\verts}[1]{\left\vert\,{#1}\,\right\vert}$
I'll assume $\ds{a, t \in \mathbb{R}}$.
\begin{align}
\mc{I}\pars{a} &\equiv
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\expo{-\ic\verts{t}\root{a^{2} + x^{2}}} \over \root{a^{2} + x^{2}}}\,\dd x
\,\,\,\stackrel{x\ =\ \verts{a}\sinh\pars{\theta}}{=}\,\,\,
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\expo{-\ic\verts{t}\verts{a}\cosh\pars{\theta}}\dd\theta
\\[5mm] & =
\bbx{-\pi\ic\,\mrm{H}_{0}^{\mrm{\pars{2}}}\pars{\verts{at}}\,,\qquad
a t \not= 0}
\end{align}
$\ds{\mrm{H}_{\nu}^{\mrm{\pars{2}}}}$ is a
Hankel Function.
Note that
$\ds{\,\mc{I}\pars{a} \sim -2\ln\pars{\verts{at}}}$ as $\ds{at \to 0}$
and $\ds{\,\mc{I}\pars{a} \sim -\ic\root{2\pi}\expo{-\ic\pi/4}{\expo{\ic\verts{at}} \over \verts{at}^{1/2}}}$ as $\ds{\verts{at} \to \infty}$.
The following picture is a drawing of $\ds{\verts{\pi\,\mrm{H}_{0}^{\mrm{\pars{2}}}\pars{x}}}$:

The complex function under the integral does not behave well (is not meromorphic) in $\pm i$, so there is no residue there.
– dan_fulea May 02 '18 at 21:53