So, we agree on understanding the meaning of the dots
" ... $F_{k-2}+F_{k-4}+F_{k-6}+F_{k-8}+\cdots$ and so on till $F_{k\,mod\,2+2}$".
Now we shall agree on the meaning of "till".
Using the dots leads to assume (as a standard interpretation) that you mean to say
$$
F_{\,k - 2} + F_{\,k - 4} + \cdots + F_{\,k\bmod 2 + 2} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,\left\lfloor {{k \over 2}} \right\rfloor - 1} {F_{\,k - 2j} }
$$
and the standard interpretation of this sum is that, whenever
the index does not respect the conditions imposed, then the sum is considered null, e.g.
$$
\sum\limits_{a\, \le \,k\, \le \,b} {f(k)} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \sum\limits_{a\, \le \,k\, \le \,b\quad \left| {\;b\, < \,a} \right.} {f(k)} = \sum\limits_{k\, \in \;\emptyset } {f(k)} = 0
$$
There is another interpretation of the sum allowing for the bounds
to be reversed, but you do not use dots to indicate it.
Coming to your problem, since
$$
\eqalign{
& k - 2j = k\bmod 2 + 2\quad \Rightarrow \quad \cr
& \Rightarrow \quad 2j = k - k\bmod 2 - 2 = 2\left\lfloor {{k \over 2}} \right\rfloor + k\bmod 2 - k\bmod 2 - 2 \cr
& \Rightarrow \quad j = \left\lfloor {{k \over 2}} \right\rfloor - 1 \cr}
$$
Then we write your recurrence as
$$ \bbox[lightyellow] {
F_{\,k - 1} - 1 = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,\left\lfloor {{k \over 2}} \right\rfloor - 1} {F_{\,k - 2j} } \quad \left| {\;2 \le k} \right.
} \tag{1}$$
and, it seems that, the thesis you want to demonstrate is :
if the $F_k$ obeys the Fibonacci recurrence $F_{k+1}=F_{k}+F_{k-1} \quad | \; 2 \le k$
then they obey to the recurrence above.
The starting conditions are
$$
\eqalign{
& k = 2\quad \Rightarrow \quad F_{\,1} - 1 = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,0} {F_{\,2 - 2j} } = 0\quad \Rightarrow \quad F_{\,1} = 1 \cr
& k = 3\quad \Rightarrow \quad F_{\,2} - 1 = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,0} {F_{\,3 - 2j} } = 0\quad \Rightarrow \quad F_{\,2} = 1 \cr}
$$
which indicates that actually $F_1 \; F_2$ equal the respective Fibonacci N.. But let's proceed apart from initial conditions
because in the thesis we did not involve the initial conditions, but only the recurrence.
We can put
$$
k = 2m + i\quad \left| \matrix{
\;1 \le m \hfill \cr
\;i = 0,1 \hfill \cr} \right.
$$
and write the system
$$ \bbox[lightyellow] {
\left\{ \matrix{
F_{\,2m - 1} - 1 = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right)} } \hfill \cr
F_{\,2m} - 1 = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right) + 1} } \hfill \cr} \right.\quad \Leftrightarrow \quad \left\{ \matrix{
F_{\,2m} + F_{\,2m - 1} - 2 = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {\left( {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right)} + F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right) + 1} } \right)} \hfill \cr
F_{\,2m} - F_{\,2m - 1} = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {\left( {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right) + 1} - F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right)} } \right)} \hfill \cr} \right.
} \tag{2}$$
since the validity of a system implies the validity of the system of the sum and difference of the single lines.
So if the $F$ obeys the Fibonacci recurrence, then the first reads
$$ \bbox[lightyellow] {
\eqalign{
& F_{\,2m} + F_{\,2m - 1} - 2 = F_{\,2m + 1} - 2 = F_{\,2\left( {m + 1} \right) - 1} - 2 = \cr
& = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {\left( {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right)} + F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right) + 1} } \right)}
= \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right) + 2} } = \cr
& = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m + 1} \right) - 2j} }
= \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m + 1 - 2} {F_{\,2\left( {m + 1} \right) - 2j} } = \cr
& = \sum\limits_{\,1\, \le \,j\, \le \,\left\lfloor {{{2\left( {m + 1} \right)} \over 2}} \right\rfloor - 1 - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m + 1} \right) - 2j} }
= \sum\limits_{\,1\, \le \,j\, \le \,\left\lfloor {{{2\left( {m + 1} \right)} \over 2}} \right\rfloor - 1}
{F_{\,2\left( {m + 1} \right) - 2j} } - F_{\,2\left( {m + 1} \right) - 2\left( {\left\lfloor {{{2\left( {m + 1} \right)} \over 2}} \right\rfloor - 1} \right)} = \cr
& = \sum\limits_{\,1\, \le \,j\, \le \,\left\lfloor {{k \over 2}} \right\rfloor - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m + 1} \right) - 2j} } - F_{\,2} \quad \Rightarrow \cr
& \Rightarrow \quad F_{\,2\left( {m + 1} \right) - 1} - 2 = \sum\limits_{\,1\, \le \,j\, \le \,\left\lfloor {{k \over 2}} \right\rfloor - 1}
{F_{\,2\left( {m + 1} \right) - 2j} } - F_{\,2} = \sum\limits_{\,1\, \le \,j\, \le \,\left\lfloor {{k \over 2}} \right\rfloor - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m + 1} \right) - 2j} } - 1\quad TRUE \cr}
} \tag{3.a}$$
while the second line reads
$$ \bbox[lightyellow] {
\eqalign{
& F_{\,2m} - F_{\,2m - 1} = F_{\,2m - 2} = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {\left( {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right) + 1} - F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right)} } \right)} = \cr
& = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {\left( {F_{\,2m - 1 - 2j} } \right)} = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,\left\lfloor {{{2m - 1} \over 2}} \right\rfloor - 1} {\left( {F_{\,2m - 1 - 2j} } \right)} \quad TRUE \cr}
} \tag{3.b}$$
----- Answer to your comment -----
If you want to restate the above in a "classical" induction process, then you can put
1) Thesis
$$
{\rm Fibonacci}\;{\rm Rec}{\rm .}\quad \Leftrightarrow \quad \left( 1 \right)
$$
2) Initial Match
Since the recurrence is of degree two (it involves $\Delta _{\,k} ^{\,2} F_{\,k} $) then you need to fix two initial conditions, and we saw that
$$
{\rm Thesis}\;{\rm TRUE}\quad \left| {\;k = 2,3} \right.
$$
3) True for $k=2m-1,2m$ implies true for $k=2m,2m+1$
$$
\left\{ {\matrix{
{F_{\,2m - 1} - 1 = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right)} } } & \Leftrightarrow & {F_{\,2m} - 1
= \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right) + 1} } } \cr
{F_{\,2m} - 1 = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right) + 1} } } & \Leftrightarrow & {F_{\,2m + 1} - 1
= \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m} {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right) + 2} } } \cr
} } \right.
$$
i.e.
$$
\left\{ {\matrix{
{F_{\,2m - 1} - 1 = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right)} } } & \Leftrightarrow & {F_{\,2m} - 1
= \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right) + 1} } } \cr
{F_{\,2m} - 1 = \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right) + 1} } } & \Leftrightarrow & {F_{\,2m - 1} - 1
= \sum\limits_{1\, \le \,j\, \le \,m - 1} {F_{\,2\left( {m - j} \right)} } } \cr
} } \right.
$$
and thus
$$
{\rm Thesis}\;{\rm TRUE}\quad \left| {\;k = 2,3} \right.\quad \Leftrightarrow \quad {\rm Thesis}\;{\rm TRUE}\quad \left| {\;k = 2m,2m + 1\quad \left| {\;1 \le m} \right.} \right.
$$
This formula is to prove by induction on $k$
– Muhammad Umar Farooq Qaisar May 12 '18 at 07:24