I'm working with this iteration used for approximating square roots and trying to see what I can draw out from it, and in doing so I found something very strange that I can't logically explain. I'm looking for any insight into why this is the case or perhaps a proof of it. The iteration is as follows:
$$\rho_{n+1}=\frac{(\rho_n)^2+x}{2\rho_n},\rho_0=1$$ which approximates $\sqrt x$
I'll list the first four general results here:
$$\rho_1=\frac{x+1}{2}$$ $$\rho_2=\frac{x^2+6x+1}{4x+4}$$ $$\rho_3=\frac{x^4+28x^3+70x^2+28x+1}{8x^3+56x^2+56x+8}$$ $$\rho_4=\frac{x^8+120x^7+1820x^6+8008x^5+12870x^4+8008x^3+1820x^2+120x+1}{16x^7+560x^6+4368x^5+11440x^4+11440x^3+4368x^2+560x+16}$$
The property I spotted was that in all cases, the co-efficients of $(x+1)^{2^n}$ appear in $\rho_n$, with the co-efficients of even powers on the numerator and of odd powers on the denominator of $\rho_n$, in such a way that they snake through the polynomial fractions. For example $$(x+1)^8=x^8+8x^7+28x^6+56x^5+70x^4+56x^3+28x^2+8x+1$$ and a comparison with $\rho_3$ shows my point nicely.
I can show the general results as sums of multiples of powers of $(x+1)$ and $x$, e.g. $$\rho_2=\frac{(x+1)^2+4x}{4(x+1)}$$ $$\rho_3=\frac{(x+1)^4+24x(x+1)^2+16x}{8(x+1)^3+32x(x+1)}$$
however I don't know how much use this is in explaining the property I found.
Any ideas will be appreciated.