I am a bit confused using d'Alembert's formula for solving the one-dimensional wave equation, and more precisely when it involves the Dirac-function.
Some information before my question:
Let's say we have the most basic wave equation in a limited interval:
$u''_{tt}-\Delta u = 0, 0<x<2$, since 1D $\rightarrow \Delta u = u''_{xx}$.
With beginning value (and homogeneous Dirichlet conditions on the boundary):
$u'_{t}(x,0) = \delta (x-1) $
I am aware of the possibility of solving it with an initial guess of eigenfunctions to the Laplace operator and expanding into Fourier series, but for the sake of being able to visualize the solution analytically d'Alembert's gives an easier solution.
So, in order to solve this problem we need to expand our limited interval to $x \in R$, and since we have homogenous Dirichlet conditions we expand odd, so our beginning value is
$\tilde u'_{t}(x,0) = \delta (x-1) - \delta (x+1), -2<x<2 $.
Using d'Alembert's formula our solution would be the primitive function of our expanded beginning function:
$ \int_{x-t}^{x+t} (\delta (x-1)-\delta (x+1))dx$.
This solution would thus grant us four different $\theta$-functions (Heaviside step function).
My question is, does anything in the solution become affected of our expanding of the interval? I.e., since we are now looking at $-2<x<2$ instead of $0<x<2$.
I have been looking at some problems on this, and in the solution there seems to be some subtracted numbers, and my guess in this case would be a subtraction by 4 (length of the interval). I've seen this done more or less randomly with different intervals and so on, which is why I have no argument as to why it should be done and in what way it would be done.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Kind regards
I expand my interval so that d'Alembert's can be applied to the problem (infinite problem after expanding).
I don't really understand your explanation. I must add/subtract this change at appropriate position in the terms. Yes, but could you please explain it a bit more concrete? I.e. this doesn't make me any wiser, knowing I must subtract some change in some appropriate position.
In my problem above, what should I do then for example?
– ladvad Aug 19 '18 at 16:49