Short answer: I don't think you should worry, as long as you understand this sentence, which says that a function is the whole rule, not a result of applying a rule.
Thus, a function $f$ should be distinguished from its value $f(x_0)$
at the value $x_0$ in its domain.
tl;dr
In the first quoted sentence each "value" is a named object, $x_0$ in the domain and $f(x_0)$ in the codomain.
The problem with "values" comes up because functions are often described using a formula with a "variable", usually $x$. The point of the discussion is to make clear that when the function is defined that way, as in "$f(x) = x^2$" , there is really "no $x$" in the definition,
since $f(x)$ and $x^2$ should both be understood as the value of $f$
at $x$.
Here you say "value of $f$" because "value $f$" makes no sense. The modifier "value" belongs before a number.
Then this last one is really tricky. Here you say "value of $x$" because you are thinking of $x$ not as a number but as the identity function on the domain.
valid for all real values of $x$