The statement of the theorem is:
Let $E$ and $F$ be two reflexive Banach spaces. Let $ A:D(A) \subset E \rightarrow F$ be an unbounded linear operator that is densely defined and closed. Then $D(A')$ is dense in $F'$. Thus $A''$ is well defined ( $A'': D(A'')\subset E'' \rightarrow F''$) and it may also be viewed as an unbounded operator from E into F. Then we have $A''=A$.
At the end of the proof, in order to prove $A''=A$ it is stated:
$I[ G(A')]=G(A)^{\bot}$, $I[G(A'')]=G(A')^{\bot}$ $\implies$ $G(A'')=G(A)^{\bot \bot}=G(A)$
Where $I:F'\times E' \rightarrow E' \times F'$ is defined by $I([v,f])=[-f,v]$. I suppose that when he says $I[G(A'')]$ he is considering $I$ with the same form but defined on $E''\times F''$.
The last equality should be ok cause $G(A) \subset E \times F$ is closed, so $\overline{G(A)}=G(A)$ (is this correct?). I am trying to understand why it is true that $G(A'')=G(A)^{\bot \bot}$ . I have proved that $I[G(A')]=G(A)^{\bot}$, is it also true that $I[G(A')^{\bot}]=G(A)$?
Could anyone help me to prove it? Thank you all in advance.