0

Problem

Assume that $f(x)$ is derivable over $(a,b)$. Prove that there exsits no discontinuity point of the first kind for $f'(x)$ over $(a,b)$.

Proof

Assume that $f'(x)$ has a discontinuity point of the first kind at $x=x_0$ where $x_0 \in (a,b)$. Then, at least, $\lim\limits_{x \to x_0+}f'(x)$ and $\lim\limits_{x \to x_0-}f'(x)$ both exist. Since $f(x)$ is derivable over $(a,b)$, $f(x)$ is continuous over $[x_0,x_0+h]\subset [x_0,b)$. Thus, by Largrange's Mean Value Theorem, we obtain $$\lim_{h \to 0+}\frac{f(x_0+h)-f(x_0)}{h}=\lim_{h \to 0+}\frac{f'(\xi)h}{h}=\lim_{h \to 0+}f'(\xi)=\lim_{\xi \to x_0+}f'(\xi),$$ where $\xi \in (x_0,x_0+h)$. This shows that, at $x=x_0$, the right derivative of $f(x)$ equals the right limit of $f'(x)$. Likewise, we may obatin, at the same point, the left derivative of $f(x)$ equals the left limit of $f'(x)$ too. But, the fact that $f(x)$ is derivable at $x=x_0$ requires that at $x=x_0$ the left and the right derivatives are equal, therefore, the left and the right limits of $f'(x)$ are also equal, whcih shows that $f'(x)$ is contionuous at $x=x_0$. Now, the contradiction comes out.

mengdie1982
  • 13,840
  • 1
  • 14
  • 39
  • 2
    Nitpick: One says "differentiable", not "derivable". And the corresponding verb is to "differentiate", not to "derive". – MPW Sep 26 '18 at 17:19
  • @MPW But in some documents, the two words are Interchangable. Moreover, in Chinese, the two words, "derivable" and "differentiable" are translated into “可导的” and “可微的”, respectively.... – mengdie1982 Sep 26 '18 at 17:24
  • 1
    Even so, that’s from informality or ignorance, not from correctness. It’s a common misuse, a back-formation from the word “derivative”. Of course, you can define the word to mean that, and then it’s okay. It’s like saying you can “plus” two numbers to get their sum (instead of saying you can “add” them). I hear that frequently. Everyone can probably guess what you mean, but it isn’t correct usage. – MPW Sep 26 '18 at 23:21

0 Answers0