4

enter image description here

Tried attempting by using altitude and similarity of triangles, but the problem is that variables are not getting elliminated.

maveric
  • 2,168
  • 1
    In your diagram there are no points labelled B or C. – coffeemath Oct 15 '18 at 15:30
  • @coffeemath It is a typo. The bottom points should be $B,C$. – Parcly Taxel Oct 15 '18 at 15:32
  • General hint for such problems: always find which parameters describe the problem without redundancy and express everything with them. In this case, it is obvious that addition of each rectangle is a 1-dimensional choice. For example, you can choose heights of rectangles as parameters and express their widths from geometry. – orion Oct 16 '18 at 12:31

4 Answers4

1

By Cavalieri's principle we can make the outer triangle isosceles without changing the rectangles' area. By hyperbolic transformations we can make this triangle have base 6 and height 4, again keeping the rectangle areas intact.

Let $p=P_1S_1$ and $q=P_2S_2$. The triangle area outside the rectangles, which we want to minimise, is $$p\cdot\frac34p+q\cdot\frac34q+(4-p-q)\cdot\frac34(4-p-q)$$ (The $\frac34$ factors are there because we can rearrange the unoccupied space into three 4:3 rectangles whose longer sides are $p,q,4-p-q$.) $$=\frac34\left(p^2+q^2+(4-(p+q))^2\right)$$ $$=\frac32(p^2+pq+q^2-4p-4q)+12$$ The gradient of the expression in brackets is $(2p+q-4,2q+p-4)$ and this is zero when $p=q=\frac43$. Thus these are the rectangle heights maximising the area occupied, which is $$\frac32\left(8\cdot\frac43-3\cdot\frac43\cdot\frac43\right)=8$$

Parcly Taxel
  • 103,344
0

Let's call $x$ the height from $A$ onto $S_2R_2$, $y=|S_2P_2|$, and $z=|S_1P_1|$. The area of rectangles is then $$A_r=z|S_1R_1|+y|S_2R_2|$$ We can write these segments in terms of $|BC|$ by looking at similar triangles: $$|S_2R_2|=|BC|\frac{x}{x+y+z}\\|S_1R_1|=|BC|\frac{x+y}{x+y+z}$$ Therefore: $$A_r=|BC|\frac{xy+yz+zx}{x+y+z}$$ Since $|BC|$ and $x+y+z$ are constant for a given triangle, we want to maximize $xy+yz+zx$ with the constraint that $x+y+z=k$, where $k$ is some constant. Using Lagrange multiplier method: $$\partial_x (xy+yz+zx-\lambda(x+y+z-k))=0\\\partial_y (xy+yz+zx-\lambda(x+y+z-k))=0\\\partial_z (xy+yz+zx-\lambda(x+y+z-k))=0$$ you get: $$y+z-\lambda=0\\x+z-\lambda=0\\x+y-\lambda=0$$ Using $x+y+z=k$, when adding these equations you get$$2k-3\lambda=0$$ or $\lambda=\frac{2}{3}k$. The solution is $$x=y=z=\frac{k}{3}$$ Then $$\max(A_r)=\frac{3(k/3)^2}{k}|BC|=\frac{k|BC|}{3}$$ Notice that $k|BC|$ is twice the area of the triangle, so $$\max(A_r)=8$$

Andrei
  • 37,370
  • can we solve without multiplier method.because this question of a class which is not taught this method. some other method please using single variable calculus – maveric Oct 15 '18 at 16:18
  • Yes, you can. But it reduces to the same thing. Let's use $z=k-x-y$. Then what you want to minimize is $xy+x(k-x-y)+y(k-x-y)$. Take the derivatives with respect to $x$ and $y$, set them to $0$ and you get $x+y=2k/3$ or $z=k/3$. You will also get $x=y=z$. Plug it into the equation for the area, and you get the answer – Andrei Oct 15 '18 at 17:13
  • we still have two variables – maveric Oct 15 '18 at 17:14
  • That's why you have two derivatives, and both need to be zero. Take the derivative with respect to $x$ and you get $y+k-2x-y-y=0$ and similarly, taking the derivative with respect to $y$ you get $x+-x+k-x-2y=0$. Adding these equations yield $3(x+y)=2k$, meaning $z=k/3$. – Andrei Oct 15 '18 at 17:27
0

The two apiled rectangles leave an area associated to three similar triangles. The rectangles will have maximum area when the three similar triangles are equal

or ressuming

$$ \frac 12 b\cdot h = 12 \Rightarrow b\cdot h = 24\\ 3\frac 12 \left(\frac b3\cdot\frac h3\right) = 4 $$

so the maximum area is $12-4 = 8$

NOTE

The problem is the same depending on the number of apiled squares. In the case of $n$ we have the maximum squares area is given by $12 - n\left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{b}{n}\frac{h}{n}\right) = 12-\frac{12}{n}$ for $n = 1, 2,\cdots$

To show the necessity of the equality between the small excess triangles think on the problem depicted in the included picture.

enter image description here

Cesareo
  • 33,252
  • from where and how are tou getting b/3, h/3? – maveric Oct 15 '18 at 17:15
  • @maveric The triangles which represent the lateral area difference for each quadrilateral and also the summit triangle, are both similar to the big one with area $12$ If both three are equal located at one side one below the other, being equal their dimensions are proportional by $\frac 13$. Note that their height should sum $h$ so each has $\frac h3$ and by similitude $\frac b3$ also. – Cesareo Oct 15 '18 at 17:31
  • @ChristianBlatter Could you please explain the meaning of out of blue? Thanks. It can be reasoned as to show that the condition of three equal triangles is necessary. – Cesareo Oct 16 '18 at 08:18
  • @ChristianBlatter I would try to include as a note in my answer. I will fight with the idiomatic frontiers because I am not english parlant. – Cesareo Oct 16 '18 at 10:52
  • 1
    I got it: We see three small right triangles along $AB$ and three along $AC$. In order to minimize the total area of these six triangles we argue as follows: The sum of the areas of the three triangles along $AB$ is proportional to the sum of the squares of their hypotenuses. This sum is minimal iff the three hypotenuses all have the same length. – Christian Blatter Oct 16 '18 at 12:22
  • @ChristianBlatter This is a good argument too. My argument would be by reductio ad absurdum. – Cesareo Oct 16 '18 at 12:42
0

Drop a perpendicular from $A$ to the base, and consider the "right half" $S$ of the triangle, whereby we may assume $A=(0,1)$, $C=(1,0)$, $Q_1=(x,0)$, $\>0\leq x\leq1$. If there were just one rectangle we would have to maximize $x(1-x)$, leading to $x={1\over2}$. For two rectangles we therefore have to maximize $$f(x):=x(1-x)+\left({x\over2}\right)^2=x-{3\over4}x^2\ .$$ The maximum is at $x={2\over3}$ with $f\left({2\over3}\right)={1\over3}$. It follows that $${{\rm area}_\max(R_1\cup R_2)\over{\rm area}(S)}={f\bigl({2\over3}\bigr)\over{1\over2}}={{1\over3}\over{1\over2}}={2\over3}\ ,$$ so that the answer to the question is ${2\over3}\cdot12=8$.