0

What is wrong with the following argument?

By Postulate 3, we describe a circle centered at $A$ with a distance $BC$. Pick any point on the boundary of the circle. Call this point $F$. By Postulate 1, we connect $A$ and $F$ in a straight line. By the def. of circles, $AF$ = $BC$.

ski
  • 107

2 Answers2

1

"Pick any point" isn't a thing that any of the axioms allow you to do.

user3482749
  • 6,660
1

Postulate 3 allows you to construct a circle centered on one end of the given length (to be used as the radius). It does not justify constructing a circle centered on a point that is not an endpoint of the given segment.

Consequently, in your first line, one of $B$ or $C$ must be $A$.

Eric Towers
  • 67,037
  • "3. To describe a circle with any center and distance."

    Maybe the notion got lost in the translation, but do you agree that it sounds like I can fix a center, and pick any arbitrary distance (to be used as radius), like BC in this case?

    – ski Nov 24 '18 at 00:54
  • @ski : No. The proposition 2 is how you show you can transport a specified distance over to a given point. Postulate 3 allows you to produce a circle with a given center passing through a given point (so that the radius is the distance between the two given points). – Eric Towers Nov 24 '18 at 00:59