If one expands a function $\phi(x,v(\theta),t)$ to complex Fourier series marked like: $$\phi(x,v(\theta),t)=\sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} \phi_k(x,t) e^{ik\theta}$$
then why/how does argument $v$ "disappear"?
Intuitively,
$$\phi_k(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} e^{-int} \phi(x,v(\theta),t) dsomething$$
Would the notation used perhaps suggest that $dsomething=dv$?
And that by "going backwards" one "recovers" $v$ to $\phi(x,v,t)$, when one computes the complex Fourier series?