1

I spent perhaps 30 mins graphing the following function. $$y = \frac{1}{|{2x-x^2}|} + \frac{1}{|{2x+x^2}|}$$

I proceeded by first graphing the first half of the function $y = \frac{1}{|{2x-x^2}|}$.

Then I graphed the second part of the function $y = \frac{1}{|{2x+x^2}|}$.

Then using both graphs I drew a combined version which I used as my answer to the exercise.

This process was fairly time consuming and I am wondering is there a more concise way of doing this? Is there a way of understanding the general shape of such functions like we understand the more basic functions such as $y = \frac{1}{x}$ or $y = x^3$ and then just inputing some key input values to get a more precise description of the graph?

If I could have an intuition of more complex functions that are combinations of the more basic functions it would be much easier to do such graphing exercises. Is there a method for getting such intuition? Is there a more concise way to complete such graphing exercises?

esc1234
  • 131
  • 1
  • 11
  • What were you ask precisely? Because taking 30 minutes to find the various cases, the local minimums, the inflection points if any, the asymptotes, the symmetries... is not so bad! – mathcounterexamples.net Jan 04 '19 at 19:49
  • I was asked to "graph the following functions and specify whether each is odd or even" – esc1234 Jan 04 '19 at 20:05

4 Answers4

0

You need to consider four cases:

  1. $x<-2$

  2. $-2<x<0$;

  3. $0<x<2$ and

  4. $x>2$.

  • what your suggesting is in the event that the function to be graphed contains fractions, leverage that by finding out when the denominator is 0 and evaluate x-values within those intervals. thanks! But is there a general method or way of intuitively visualizing such complex graphs or is it a matter of evaluating x-values and grinding away? – esc1234 Jan 04 '19 at 19:49
  • @esc1234 With the absolute value this is the method, which you saw. In the general case I just don't know. – Michael Rozenberg Jan 04 '19 at 19:51
0

Abuse that:

$$|x|=x \text { or } -x$$

Figure out when both expressions inside the moduli are positive or negative and graph those cases individually.

Rhys Hughes
  • 12,842
  • yeah the absolute value just flips negative values around the x-axis. Im learning how this works through this graphing practice. The absolute value symbols make the function look more daunting but it's not that more difficult really – esc1234 Jan 04 '19 at 19:53
0

Why not just plot it--using software available to all?

enter image description here

And let me strongly recommend anyone who thinks graphing "by hand" is in any way superior to graphing by computer (e.g., because it teaches "fundamentals" or "solidifies understanding"), see this important TED talk.

The OP spent "perhaps 30 min" trying to graph this function by hand and understand it. I spent less than one minute writing the below code. For those who can run Mathematica, try it and leave a comment as to whether or not you understand the underlying function better by interacting with the figure (for 30 minutes!) than by getting out paper and pencil.

Manipulate[
  Plot[1/Abs[a x + x^2] + 1/Abs[b x - x^2], 
  {x, -5, 5}],
 {{a, 2}, 1, 3}, {{b, 2}, 1, 3}]

enter image description here

  • If you're suggest graphing software, at least suggest the best one – Rhys Hughes Jan 04 '19 at 19:44
  • Suggesting a software to graph a map on a math site is a funny joke! – mathcounterexamples.net Jan 04 '19 at 19:45
  • the exercise requires to do it by hand as a means of solidifying understanding. I could always cheat but I don't want to :) – esc1234 Jan 04 '19 at 19:45
  • 1
    @RhysHughes: Um.... what did you mean by "abuse that"? – David G. Stork Jan 04 '19 at 19:46
  • @RhysHughes i use desmos too, thanks :) – esc1234 Jan 04 '19 at 19:50
  • 1
    @mathcounterexamples.net: The problem mentioned nothing whatsoever about plotting "by hand." 99.99% of math is done on computers now (when was the last time you inverted a matrix "by hand"!!?), and mathematicians working in most sub-disciplines who are not versed in tools such as Mathematica are the "funny joke". Are hand calculators "jokes" too? – David G. Stork Jan 04 '19 at 19:52
  • 1
    @DavidG.Stork it should be plainly obvious that if i was making use of plotting calculators I wouldn't be asking the question in the first place... – esc1234 Jan 04 '19 at 19:57
  • @DavidG.Stork Computers are computing. Math is about proves (at least based on usual definition of mathematics)... And in that field computers (at least as of today) are dwarfs. Computers are not doing math. Rare are the computers that are used to prove something. For example inverting a matrix using Gauss Jordan algorithm is not doing math. Proving that Gauss Jordan allows to invert a matrix is. – mathcounterexamples.net Jan 04 '19 at 20:39
  • @mathcounterexamples.net: Math is not just about proofs, and the vast majority of students who will use math will never prove anything new (yet solve many math problems), and math education (relevant here) certainly isn't just about proofs: most educational effort is spent on calculating, which is the part of math that computers will always be far far superior to humans. You're right that currently humans excel in proofs, but computers are being used ever more frequently as tools in proofs (viz. four-color theorem)--which is my point. If only Euler and Gauss had had Mathematica! – David G. Stork Jan 04 '19 at 20:55
0

$2 x - x^2 = x (2 - x) = 0$ when $x=0$ or $2$, and similarly $2 x + x^2 = 0$ when $x = 0$ or $-2$.
$1/|2x - x^2|$ is always positive, goes to $0$ at $\pm \infty$ and to $+\infty$ as $x \to 0$ or $2$, so looks something like this:

enter image description here

(well, exactly like that, since I used software, but you could do a similar rough sketch by hand). $1/|2x + x^2| = 1/|2(-x) - (-x)^2|$ is the reflection of this across the $y$ axis. It goes to $0$ at $\pm \infty$ and to $+\infty$ as $x \to -2$ or $0$. Thus the sum of these looks something like

enter image description here

Robert Israel
  • 448,999
  • thanks for the explanation, the method you illustrated seems a good bit more efficient than the method I used described above. – esc1234 Jan 05 '19 at 07:38