My question has its roots in the following question that I had asked earlier:
Prove that the sum of digits of $(999...9)^{3}$ (cube of integer with $n$ digits $9$) is $18n$
Now while going through some classical texts on Number Theory, I had come across this statement that such results as the sum of digits of a number are of trivial nature and are not studied too rigorously.
Similarly, books on trigonometry often suggest that versine and coversine as ratios of much less importance which may be "skipped".
I often wonder what leads to such statements in mathematics wherein one attributes certain level of relative importance to some topics, theorems or identities while lending just a cursory remark upon the others. Is there a formal way to identify or measure as to what is of significant importance and worth pursuing in mathematics and what may be not?
A counter example could be Fermat's last theorem and its proof. The statement itself may appear trivial and lacking any practical applications but it still has been pursued rigorously by mathematicians centuries over.
Simply put how do we assess the relative "worth" of the countless mathematical ideas?Further adding to it do we have any hierarchy whereby we can quantify the relative weight-age of various concepts.