Use the rules of inference together with basic logical equivalences to show that the following argument is valid. Name the rule you use at each step.
w ∨ ¬z → r
s ∨ ¬w
¬t
z → t
¬z ∧ r → ¬s
—————–
∴ ¬w
I'm really not sure how to work through this problem, I've never worked on a 5 line inference question so I'm not sure how to grasp this.