0

$x>0$, $A>0$ and $C>1$.

I am trying to come up with a closed form expression for $x$, even if it is an approximation.

Any help appreciated.

  • 1
    Have you tried squaring both sides? I know it may add more solutions but doing something generally generates more interest in your question – Mandelbrot Feb 27 '19 at 19:48
  • 1
    I've tried to solve the quartic equation and it is doable, if we can solve the following: $$ z (z + 1)(z +2) = AC^2 \ / \ (C-1)^{3/2} $$ At least one solution $z$ is needed, although getting all solutions makes later calculations easier. In further calculations $$ z\cdot A{(C-1)^{1/2}} $$ is used. Would this be any help? $\ $ I used the algorithm from [http://www.sosmath.com/algebra/factor/fac12/fac12.html ], see also [http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.cubic.equations.html ]. – eudes Mar 02 '19 at 08:06
  • @eudes or $$ w^3 - w = AC^2 \ / \ (C-1)^{3/2}, \quad w = z+1 $$ – eudes Mar 02 '19 at 08:13
  • @eudes I looked at the algorithms but I don't know what can be done about the cubic equation, since I can't say anything about $A$ or $C$ other than what I posted in the question. I think I will resort to numerical approach. – Zaeem Hussain Mar 07 '19 at 16:09

3 Answers3

2

Square both sides and you get a quartic equation for $x$. Quartics do have closed-form solutions, but they are not pretty.

If you want an approximation, you should tell us what parameters can be considered as "small" or "large".

Robert Israel
  • 448,999
1

Squaring your equation and expanding we get $$x^4+4x^3+6x^2+4x-A^2Cx+1-A^2=0$$ It is a polynomial of degree four.I think you will need a numerical method, if values for the parameters are given.

1

Numerically you can solve it using iterative process. Take initial approximation for your root, let's say $x_0=1$ and calculate the next approximation using this formula: $$x_k=\sqrt{A\sqrt{1+Cx_{k-1}}}-1$$ Stop the process when $|x_k-x_{k-1}|$ is small enough for your application.

Vasili
  • 10,690