Differentiability: for sure $g$ is differentiable as this sum is locally finite and each $x\longmapsto f(x+k)$ is differentiable. Fix $n\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then observe
$$
x>n-1\;\mbox{and}\; k\geq 11-n\quad\Rightarrow \quad x+k>n-1+11-n=10\quad\Rightarrow \quad f(x+k)=0
$$
and
$$
x<n+1\;\mbox{and}\; k\leq -11-n\quad\Rightarrow \quad x+k<n+1-11-n=-10\quad\Rightarrow \quad f(x+k)=0.
$$
So if $x$ belongs to $(n-1,n+1)$, the terms $f(x+k)$ vanish for all $k\geq 11-n$ and $k\leq -11-n$. Thus
$$
g(x)=\sum_{k=-10-n}^{10-n}f(x+k)\qquad\forall x\in (n-1,n+1).
$$
First, this shows that $g$ is well-defined. And since this is a finite sum of differentiable functions on $(n-1,n+1)$, $g$ is differentiable on $(n-1,n+1)$ and, simply,
$$
g'(x)=\sum_{k=-10-n}^{10-n}f'(x+k)\qquad\forall x\in (n-1,n+1).
$$
Now $\mathbb{R}=\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}(n-1,n+1)$. Hence $g$ is differentiable on $\mathbb{R}$.
Note: observe that $g$ is $1$-periodic as the index set $\mathbb{Z}$ is invariant under the shift $x\longmapsto x+1$. So it suffices to prove the differentiability of $g$ on $(0,2)$. But it does not really simplify the argument.
Zeros of the derivative: by periodicity, as soon as $g'$ has a zero $x_0$, it must have infinitely many zeros as it vanishes on $x_0+\mathbb{Z}$. Now since $g$ is differentiable on $\mathbb{R}$ and $1$-periodic, it suffices to apply Rolle on the interval $[0,1]$, as $g(0)=g(1)$, to see that there exists $x_0\in (0,1)$ such that $g'(x_0)=0$.
Conclusion: 1 is the only correct option.