0

Suppose I want to prove a general statement like 'A is true if and only if B is true'

If I assumed B is untrue and showed that subsequently A is untrue, which direction am I actually proving? I guess it is the direction going from left to right?

  • 3
    Correct. Proving that $\neg B\implies \neg A$ is equivalent to proving that $A\implies B$. Assuming you finished that step, then what remains to prove the bi-implication is to prove $B\implies A$ or to prove $\neg A\implies \neg B$. – JMoravitz May 22 '19 at 13:37
  • @JMoravitz Thank you for clearing up on this! – UnsinkableSam May 22 '19 at 13:41
  • @JMoravitz isn't that an answer (rather than a comment)? – John Doe May 22 '19 at 13:41

1 Answers1

0

Exactly. If you assumed that $B$ is untrue, and proved that $A$ is then untrue, you have proven the statement $\neg B\implies \neg A$. This statement is logically equivalent to the statement $A\implies B$, which means you proved the direction from left to right.

You still have to prove either $B\implies A$ or its equivalent, $\neg A\implies \neg B$.

5xum
  • 123,496
  • 6
  • 128
  • 204