So we already know that $m^*(A \times B)\leq m^*(A)m^*(B)$ for an outer measure now I am trying to prove that it is an equality in Lebesgue measure. I know that is true if we consider one of the sets to be open, we need to use the Fubini theorem in the proof, now it is for an arbitrary set. I tried considering an open set $U$ that covers one of them and use the result I already know but I didn't get far. Any help is appreciated, Thanks.
-
2do you agree that $m^(A\times B) = \inf_{\text{open } U \supseteq A} m^(U\times B)$? If so, then you're basically done – mathworker21 Jun 03 '19 at 12:35
-
Hint: Use the regularity of Lebesgue outer measure. – Bach Jun 03 '19 at 12:40
-
I can see that if that is true we are done , I just dont see why that is true. Shouldnt my open set be covering $A\times B$? – Someone Jun 03 '19 at 12:40
-
Looks trivial from definition of Lebesgue outer measure – ibnAbu Jun 03 '19 at 19:17
-
It doesnt seem to me but maybe im not thinking about it the right way – Someone Jun 03 '19 at 21:07
1 Answers
You don't even need Fubini's theorem. Note that if either is infinite or $0$, then it's trivial, so assume that $m^*(A)$ and $m^*(B)$ are positive and finite. Now, fix $\epsilon>0$. By the definition of outer measure, there exists a countable covering of $A$ by open boxes $(A_j)$ so that $$\sum_j\text{vol} (A_j)<m^*(A)+\frac{\epsilon}{2m^*(B)}.$$ Similarly, we get a countable covering of $B$ by open boxes $(B_k)$ so that $$\sum_k\text{vol} (B_k)<m^*(B)+\frac{\epsilon}{2\sum\limits_j \text{vol} (A_j)}.$$ Now, observe that $$m^*(A)m^*(B)\geq m^*(B)\sum\limits_j\text{vol}(A_j)-\epsilon/2\geq\sum\limits_k\text{vol}(B_k)\sum\limits_{j} \text{vol}(A_j)-\epsilon.$$ Further, $(A_j\times B_k)$ is a countable collection of open boxes covering $A\times B$, with $$\sum\limits_{j,k} \text{vol}(A_j\times B_k)=\sum\limits_j \text{vol}(A_j)\sum\limits_k \text{vol}(B_k),$$ and so by countable subadditivity, $$m^*(A\times B)\leq m^*(A)m^*(B)+\epsilon,$$ where $\epsilon>0$ was arbitrary.
- 12,303