8

For non-negative integers $m$ and $n$, the double sum $$\sum_{j=0}^{n} \sum_{i=0}^{m} (-1)^{i+j} {m \choose i} {n \choose j} {i+j \choose i}$$ can be checked to be 0 or 1. How can one show this by hand, along with the conditions on $m$ and $n$?

Z Ahmed
  • 43,235

3 Answers3

7

The Laguerre Polynomials are defined as $$L_n(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{n} (-1)^{j} \frac{{n \choose j}}{j!} x^J,~~~(1)$$ these are well known to follow the orthogonality condition as $$\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x} L_m(x)~ L_n(x)~ dx=\delta_{m,n}~,~~~~(2)$$ where $\delta_{m,n}$ is the Kroneckor delta function, If we insert (1) in (2), we get $$\int_{0}^{\infty}\sum_{i=0}^{m} \sum_{0}^{n} (-1)^{i+j} \frac{{m \choose i}}{i!} \frac{{n \choose j}}{j!} x^{i+j} e^{-x}~ dx= \delta_{m,n}.$$ Finally, $\int_{0}^{\infty} x^k e^{-x}~dx= k!$, leads to $$\sum_{i=0}^{m} \sum_{j=0}^{n} (-1)^{i+j} {m \choose i} {n \choose j} {i+j \choose i} = \delta_{m,n}.$$ Hence the result.

Z Ahmed
  • 43,235
3

This is a slight variation of @MarkoRiedels nice answer. We use the coefficient of operator $[z^k]$ to denote the coefficient of $z^k$ of a series. This way we can write for instance \begin{align*} [z^k](1+z)^n=\binom{n }{k}\tag{1} \end{align*}

We obtain for integral $m,n\geq 0$: \begin{align*} \color{blue}{\sum_{p=0}^n}&\color{blue}{\sum_{q=0}^m(-1)^{p+q}\binom{n}{p}\binom{m}{q}\binom{p+q}{q}}\\ &=\sum_{p=0}^n\binom{n}{p}(-1)^p\sum_{q=0}^m\binom{m}{q}(-1)^q[z^q](1+z)^{p+q}\tag{2}\\ &=[z^0]\sum_{p=0}^n\binom{n}{p}(-1)^p(1+z)^p\sum_{q=0}^m\binom{m}{q}\left(-\frac{1+z}{z}\right)^q\tag{3}\\ &=[z^0]\sum_{p=0}^n\binom{n}{p}(-1)^p(1+z)^p\left(1-\frac{1+z}{z}\right)^m\tag{4}\\ &=(-1)^m[z^m]\sum_{p=0}^n\binom{n}{p}(-1)^p(1+z)^p\tag{5}\\ &=(-1)^m[z^m]\left(1-(1+z)\right)^n\\ &=(-1)^{m+n}[z^m]z^n\\ &\,\,\color{blue}{=[[m=n]]}\tag{6} \end{align*}

and the claim follows.

Comment:

  • In (2) we use the coefficient of operator according to (1).

  • In (3) we do some rearrangements and apply the rule $[z^{p-q}]A(z)=[z^p]z^qA(z)$.

  • In (4) we apply the binomial theorem.

  • In (5) we do some simplifications and apply the rule from (3) again.

  • In (6) we use Iverson Brackets.

Markus Scheuer
  • 108,315
  • Thank you for your contribution. I hope it helps clarify the method that was used in the two combinatorial proofs so that we have a more readable page. To be precise the argument to the $[z^0]$ coefficient extractor on line three is not a formal power series, so for this to hold we must use the definition in terms of residues $${n\choose k} = [z^k] (1+z)^n = \mathrm{Res}_{z=0} \frac{1}{z^{k+1}} (1+z)^n.$$ The proof as I posted it uses formal power series only (no pole at zero). – Marko Riedel Jun 23 '19 at 20:24
  • @MarkoRiedel: You're welcome and thanks for the credit. I also hope, it helps to clarify the used technique. Thank you for the additional information which also makes the change of order of summation of the inner sum in your first line plausible. – Markus Scheuer Jun 23 '19 at 20:37
2

Starting from

$$\sum_{p=0}^n \sum_{q=0}^m (-1)^{p+q} {n\choose p} {m\choose q} {p+q\choose q}$$

we write

$$\sum_{p=0}^n (-1)^{p} {n\choose p} \sum_{q=0}^m (-1)^{m-q} {m\choose q} {p+m-q\choose m-q} \\ = \sum_{p=0}^n (-1)^{p} {n\choose p} (-1)^m [z^m] (1+z)^{p+m} \sum_{q=0}^m (-1)^{q} {m\choose q} z^q (1+z)^{-q} \\ = \sum_{p=0}^n (-1)^{p} {n\choose p} (-1)^m [z^m] (1+z)^{p+m} \left(1-\frac{z}{1+z}\right)^m \\ = (-1)^m [z^m] \sum_{p=0}^n (-1)^{p} {n\choose p} (1+z)^{p} \\ = (-1)^m [z^m] (1-(1+z))^n = (-1)^{m+n} [z^m] z^n = (-1)^{m+n} \delta_{n,m} = \delta_{n,m}.$$

Marko Riedel
  • 61,317