I have seen the post here, but this doesn't seem to answer my problem. Say this as an example(from OpenIntro Stats Book page 112):
A Professor select a student at random to answer a question. Each student has an equal chance. There are 15 people in total. If the professor asks 3 questions, what is the probability that you will not be selected? Assume that she will not pick the same person twice in a given lecture.
The answer is
14/15 * 13/14 * 12/13
Looking at the answer, this is clearly an independent events. But I don't understand how it is an independent event. The events in question are :
- Probability of NOT getting picked for the first question
- Probability of NOT getting picked for second question
- Probability of NOT getting picked for third question
Definition of Independence is Knowing event 2, doesn't change the probability of event 1. E.g. 1 die 2 rolls. Knowing the first roll does not change the probability of the second roll.
In this case, the probability of the first event(not getting picked for the first question) is 14/15. However, because no same person will be picked twice, this CHANGES the probability of not getting picked for the second time.
So, given the information of the first event, the probability of second event (not getting picked for the second question) is no longer 14/15. It is now 13/14.
Independent law states that:
P(B|A) = P(B)
If P(A) denotes Probability of getting picked for the first question,
P(B) denotes probability getting picked for the second question, and
P(B|A) denotes probability not getting picked for the second question given a person is already picked,
the equality condition is NOT satisfied. So, why is this being solved with independent formula??
More importantly, Why is this not addition operation instead?