3

I have this Boolean to simplify.

$\bar AB\bar C + A\bar BC + AB\bar C + ABC$

I checked the final answer here. It gives the final simplification is $B\bar C + AC$

but I am confused here :

$\bar AB\bar C + A\bar BC + AB\bar C + ABC$

$\bar AB\bar C + A\bar BC + AB(\bar C+C)$

$\bar AB\bar C + A\bar BC + AB$

$\bar AB\bar C + A(\bar BC + B)$

$\bar AB\bar C + A(C + B)$

$\bar AB\bar C + AC + AB$

$B(\bar A\bar C + A) + AC$ (1st and 3rd considered)

$B(\bar C + A) + AC$

$B\bar C + AB + AC$

Here, How can I go further to simplify $B\bar C + AB + AC$ to $B\bar C + AC$

How to remove $AB$ ?

test team
  • 133

3 Answers3

6

I suggest you swap $AB'C$ and $ABC'$ before simplifying:

$$\begin{align}&A'BC' + ABC' + AB'C + ABC \\=& (A'+A)BC' + (B'+B)AC \\=& BC' + AC. \end{align}$$

Magma
  • 6,270
3

Since we have AB = ABC' + ABC, it follows that

BC' + AB + AC
= BC' + ABC' + ABC + AC
= BC' + AC

The Karnaugh map is given by

enter image description here

from which it is visually clear that AB is covered by the other two, which lends itself to showing you can split AB into two parts and combine them with AC and BC'.

0

I learned Veitch diagrams back in the early 70's and I find them easier to understand than the Karnaugh maps that are popular today. Here is an example using your problem. You fill in the squares and then see what they add up to. Note, the light gray area is $AC$ and the slightly darker gray is $BC'$. Note also how $B'$ spans part of $A$ and the rest of $B$ is under $A'$ so $AB$ is eliminated.

enter image description here

poetasis
  • 6,338
  • New to Veitch diagram. And I'm unable to understand "Note also how B′ spans part of A and the rest of B is under A′ so AB is eliminated." – test team Aug 09 '19 at 17:05
  • I've seen Karnaugh maps that look $exactly$ like Veitch diagrams but the way they try to teach is more like the answer from Simply Beautiful Art and not intuitive to me. I hope you can see in my diagram that each square is filled with something-$A$, something-$B$, and something-$C$ that $maps$ to one of the terms of the original Boolean expression. Then we find that different terms are adjoined in one or more rectangles that represent new terms simpler than the originals. You can do the same with straight Boolean Algebra such as $(A'+B')'=AB$ but the visual aspect is easier to $see$. – poetasis Aug 09 '19 at 17:22
  • Eh, personally this is less intuitive, since the BC' is made up of two disconnected sections, for example. The Karnaugh map avoids this by ensuring adjacent squares differ by 1 variable, so you never have to do this (with the exception of wrapping from one side of the K-map to the other). – Simply Beautiful Art Aug 09 '19 at 21:10
  • I guess I'm just used to Veitch diagrams because I learned them so well when I was so much younger. In any case, I trust the Karnaugh maps were helpful. – poetasis Aug 10 '19 at 09:50