2

I try to compute the sum of the inverse distances to the fourth power of all unit cubes inside $\mathbb R^3$: $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{\left\lVert\vec{r}_n\right\rVert^4}$$

with cartesian coordinates this sum becomes:

$$\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty\sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty\sum_{j=-\infty}^\infty\frac{1}{(n^2+k^2+j^2)^2},$$

where the term $(n,k,j)=(0,0,0)$ is excluded. After some calculations (using symmetry, etc.) I arrived at the simpler sums: $$\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty\sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty\sum_{j=-\infty}^\infty\frac{1}{(n^2+k^2+j^2)^2}=8\cdot\sum_{n=1}^\infty\sum_{k=1}^\infty\sum_{j=1}^\infty\frac{1}{(n^2+k^2+j^2)^2}+12\cdot\sum_{n=1}^\infty\sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac{1}{(n^2+k^2)^2}+6\cdot\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^4}$$

The last two sums are equal to $2\pi^2G-\frac{\pi^4}{15}$, where $G$ is Catalan's constant, but I don't know to analyticly compute the first sum (if even possible) or any tricks how to tackle a triple sum. Does anybody know, if the triple sum has a nice analytic value or how someone might compute it?

  • Here's a whole book about this sort of thing: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Lattice-Sums-Encyclopedia-Mathematics-Applications/dp/1107039908 I don't know whether it has a formula for your sum though. – Angina Seng Aug 09 '19 at 15:19
  • @LordSharktheUnknown the problem with lattice sums is, that they are alternating. But still thanks for the quick answer – Caesar.tcl Aug 09 '19 at 15:29
  • But your lattice sum is non-alternating. – Angina Seng Aug 09 '19 at 15:49

1 Answers1

1

Determining whether or not that sum has a "nice closed form" is an open problem in number theory.

K B Dave
  • 7,912