4

The following image has both the problem and its solution. I have a doubt in the solution, the details of which I have included below the image.

enter image description here

(Assume the terms in given series are generated from a polynomial)

Here, the author has assumed $T_n$ as an arbitrary cubic equation (Step indicated by the RED box).

My doubt is, why has he assumed it as a cubic equation and not a quadratic or biquadratic equation or any other degree equation?

Please do not use Newton's forward interpolation rule as I don't know such rules. Please explain in simple terms and properties.

Kindly clarify my doubt.

2 Answers2

3

The author is assuming the original terms of the series are values from a polynomial at increasing integral values. Thus, when a sequence of differences causes all of the terms to be the same at some level $m$, the sequence $T_n$ represents a polynomial of degree $m$. For more information, see Theorem $1$ in Difference Tables of Sequences. In your case, taking the sequence of the third order differences based on those second order differences causes all of the values to be $6$. This means the original sequence represents a cubic equation.

Also, although the author doesn't use this, and the linked page only hints at it, the sequence of constant values are $a_n(n!)$ where $a_n$ is the coefficient of the $x^n$ term. Thus, in this case, $6 = a_3(3!) \implies a_3 = 1$. The author could have used this to determine that $a = 1$ more directly.

John Omielan
  • 47,976
  • Thank you for your answer. So, as the third difference here is same that is $6$, the terms are represented by a cubic equation. Will this hold good for higher orders? For example, if the 7th differences are same it will be represented by a polynomial of degree 7? Please clarify this doubt. –  Aug 17 '19 at 06:21
  • 3
    @Sumathi Yes, that is true in general. However, note it's only true, of course, if all of the values are the same. If you're not given that the original sequence is from a polynomial, technically, no matter how many terms you calculate, you can never be sure of what the degree is (apart from it being at least that of where you got the constant set of values), or even if it's a polynomial. However, that would be a reasonable assumption in most cases. – John Omielan Aug 17 '19 at 06:24
  • Thank you very much for your kind help. –  Aug 17 '19 at 06:26
  • 2
    @Sumathi You're welcome. I added a link to a Web page that states about the various orders of differences and the degrees of the associated polynomials as their Theorem $1$, along with a proof. I hope that helps to explain why that works in more detail. – John Omielan Aug 17 '19 at 06:35
  • Thank you for sharing the link. I will go through it and ask if I have any doubts. –  Aug 17 '19 at 06:39
  • 2
    @Sumathi You're welcome for the link. I also remembered you can determine the coefficient of the $x^3$ term from the constant sequence of values, as I explain in my updated answer. – John Omielan Aug 17 '19 at 06:51
-1

(Assuming the terms in given series are generated from a polynomial)

When you take the difference, you reduce the degree by $1$.

As an example, for a quadratic $T_n = n^2$, the first order differences would be in A.P: $$(n+1)^2 - n^2 = 2n+1$$

And for a cubic $T_n = n^3$, the first order differences gives you a quadratic: $$(n+1)^3-n^3=3n^2+3n+1$$

Now if you take the difference on above quadratic, you get a sequence in A.P.

AgentS
  • 12,195