-1

Let


       ⎧ -x+b,           if x < -3  
f(x) = ⎨ 2,              if x = -3  
       ⎩ (−2)/(x−b) + 1, if x > -3 (and x≠b)

What I tired is to set -x + b = $(−2)\over(x−b)$ + 1 where x is approaching -3. I get b = $7±\sqrt{33}\over{-2}$. Which is incorrect? please help!

a) For what value(s) of b is f continuous at -3?

b) For what value(s) of b does f have a removable discontinuity at -3?

  • 2
    Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please [edit] the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers. – José Carlos Santos Sep 15 '19 at 01:52

1 Answers1

1

Why were you trying to set $-x + b = \frac {-2}{x-b} + 1$?? That is completely pointless.

To have $f(x)$ continuous at $-3$, you need to have $$\lim_{x\to -3}f(x) = f(-3)$$ Because $f(x)$ is defined differently on each side of $-3$, it is useful to break the full limit into one-sided limits. So the condition becomes:

$$\lim_{x\to -3-}f(x) = f(-3)\\\lim_{x\to -3+}f(x) = f(-3)$$

Now $f(-3) = 2$, while $\lim_{x\to -3-}f(x)$ only involves the behavior of $f(x)$ for values of $x < -3$ and $\lim_{x\to -3+}f(x)$ only involves the behavior of $f(x)$ for values of $x > -3$.

$f(x)$ has a removable discontinuity at $-3$ if $\lim_{x\to -3}f(x)$ converges, but $\lim_{x\to -3}f(x) \ne f(-3)$. $\lim_{x\to -3}f(x)$ converges if both one-sided limits converge, and are equal. So a removable discontinuity requires

$$\lim_{x\to -3-}f(x) = \lim_{x\to -3+}f(x)$$

Also note that $\lim_{x\to -3-}f(x)$ and $\lim_{x\to -3+}f(x)$ are numbers. When you compute each of them, the value will not involve "$x$" at all (they will involve $b$, since the function $f$ is defined in terms of $b$, but $x$ is only a dummy variable - the value of the limit does not depend on it).

Paul Sinclair
  • 43,643