Powers of 3 and cubes are different things. Given an exponent $\alpha$ that is a positive integer, $3^\alpha$ is a power of 3. If you flip that, however, $\alpha^3$, you have a cube, and the only way that's also a power of 3 is if $\alpha = 1$ or 3.
The first few powers of 3 are: 1, 3, 9, 27, 81, 243, 729, 2187, 6561, 19683, 59049, 177147, 531441, 1594323, 4782969, 14348907. These are listed in Sloane's OEIS A000244.
The first few cubes are 1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216, 343, 512, 729, 1000, 1331, 1728, 2197, 2744, 3375, 4096, 4913, 5832, 6859, 8000, 9261, 10648, 12167, 13824, 15625, 17576, 19683, 21952, 24389. These are listed in Sloane's A000578.
The only numbers in common to both lists are 1 and 27.
So if $m$ is a power of 3 and $n$ is also a power of 3, meaning that $m = 3^\alpha$ and $n = 3^\beta$ (it doesn't matter if $\alpha = \beta$, as long as they're both positive integers), then $m + n = 3^\alpha + 3^\beta$.
Not much help there, until you notice, like the other answerer already mentioned, that powers of 3 are odd, but adding up two of them gives an even number.
Now, to prove that two nonzero cubes can never add up to a cube, well, Fermat claimed to have a wonderful proof of that which was just a wee bit too long for the margin.
One more thing. If a number is a power of 3 other than 1, its representation in the ternary numeral system consists of a single digit 1 followed by one or more digits 0. If a number is the sum of two powers of 3, then its representation in ternary is either:
- A single digit 2 followed by one more digits 0, or
- A digit 1, followed by one or more digits 0, followed by a 1 and then one or more digits 0, or
- Two digits 1 with one or more digits 0 in between them.
These numbers are also listed in Sloane's OEIS. The first few are 6, 10, 12, 18, 28, 30, 36, 54, 82, 84, 90.