I am trying to follow a proof of Bernstein's Theorem. Within this proof we consider a function $u:\mathbb{R^2} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that
$u$ is a solution of: $$ a(x,y)u_{xx} + 2b(x,y)u_{xy}+c(x,y)u_{yy} = 0 $$ With $a,b,c:\mathbb{R^2}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that $$ \begin{bmatrix} a(x,y)&b(x,y) \\ b(x,y)&c(x,y) \end{bmatrix} \textit{is positive definite on all }\mathbb{R^2} $$ And also $$ u(x,y) = o(\sqrt{x^2+y^2}) \: \text{ as } \: \sqrt{x^2+y^2}\rightarrow+\infty $$ Here's where I get stuck:
Working through the proof it is easily proven that \begin{equation} u_{xx}u_{yy}-u_{xy}^2\leq 0 \end{equation} And it is then claimed that the equality (ie, $u_{xx}u_{yy}-u_{xy}^2 = 0$) holds only on the points where $u_{xx} = u_{yy} = u_{xy} = 0$.
It seems clear to me that substituting $0$ for the second partial derivatives obviously makes the equality hold, but to claim that the equality holds if and only if the second partial derivatives are all $0$ seems like too far of a stretch. Any help is much appreciated.
P.D I have included all the hypotheses in case it helps but I believe they shouldn't be necessary.