0

$[RT = { (a, c) | \exists b \in A : (a, b) \in R \wedge (b, c) \in T }.]$

so i dont understand why a product of two relations is defined like that? product stands for * , so shouldnt it be a Cartesian product of two tuples? or do i understand the definition of a product of a cartesian product wrong?

  • 1
    I wouldn't call it a product per se, I would instead call it a composition. This page may shed more light on the topic. You should be well familiar with composition of functions at this point from example, this acts just the same. – JMoravitz Oct 25 '19 at 16:31
  • @JMoravitz that makes absolutely sense, thank you! – Laffa Yett Oct 25 '19 at 16:33

0 Answers0