Does there exist a rational function $f$ and a polynomial in $\mathbb{R}[x]$ so that: $$f(\frac{x^2}{x+1}) = p(x)$$
Asked
Active
Viewed 66 times
-1
-
4Polynomials are defined at $x=-1$, so... – David P Oct 31 '19 at 03:13
1 Answers
2
All such functions $f$ must be constant. Here's a proof.
Suppose $f$ and $p$ satisfy the conditions of the problem. We must then have: $$p(-1)=\lim_{x\to-1^+}p(x)=\lim_{x\to-1^+}f\left(\frac{x^2}{x+1}\right)=\lim_{x\to\infty}f\left(\frac{x^2}{x+1}\right)=\lim_{x\to\infty}p(x).$$ Since $p(x)$ tends to a finite value as $x\to\infty$, $p$ must be a constant polynomial. In particular, $f$ must be constant in the range of $\frac{x^2}{x+1}$, which is an infinite set, implying that $f$ must also be constant. This proves what we wanted. $\blacksquare$
ViHdzP
- 4,582
- 2
- 18
- 44
-
-
URL. What an idea! But as it stands f is not defined at x=-1, hence cannot be a polynomial. Define f at x=-1 to be = constant pol. =c , then OK.Hope this makes sense:) – Peter Szilas Oct 31 '19 at 06:30
-
@PeterSzilas You can do pretty much whatever at the point $x=-1$, if we ignore it altogether in the original problem redaction. My solution only really cares about what happens in its neighborhood ;) – ViHdzP Oct 31 '19 at 06:36
-
Fine.The problem : one equates a continuos polynomial with a function that is not defined at x=-1. Assuming a continuos extension of f at x=-1, you show that it is impossible unless f=p=constant. – Peter Szilas Oct 31 '19 at 07:10