There are two decision variables, so an extreme point corresponds to a point where two of the constraints are binding. There are four constraints, so there are a total of $\binom 42=6$ potential extreme points. We solve:
\begin{align}
x_1-4x_2 &= 4\\
-2x_1 + x_2 &= 2
\end{align}
for $(x_1,x_2) = \left(-\frac{12}7,-\frac{10}7\right),\tag1$
\begin{align}
x_1-4x_2 &= 4\\
-3x_1+4x_2&=12
\end{align}
for $(x_1,x_2) = \left(-8,-3\right),\tag2$
\begin{align}
x_1-4x_2 &= 4\\
2x_1+x_2&=8
\end{align}
for $(x_1,x_2) = \left(4,0\right),\tag3$
\begin{align}
-2x_1+x_2&=2\\
-3x_1+4x_2&=12
\end{align}
for $(x_1,x_2) = \left(\frac45,\frac{18}5\right),\tag4$
\begin{align}
-2x_1+x_2&=2\\
2x_1+x_2&=8
\end{align}
for $(x_1,x_2) = \left(\frac32,5\right),\tag5$
\begin{align}
-3x_1+4x_2&=12\\
2x_1+x_2&=8
\end{align}
for $(x_1,x_2) = \left(\frac{20}{11},\frac{48}{11}\right).\tag6$
Checking for feasibility, we find that $(2)$ and $(5)$ do not satisfy the constraints. Reforumulating the problem in terms of convex combinations of the extreme points, we have
\begin{align}
\max&\quad -\frac{32}7\lambda_1 + 4\lambda_3 + 8\lambda_4 + \frac{116}{11}\lambda_6\\
\mathrm{s.t.}&\quad \lambda_1+\lambda_3+\lambda_4+\lambda_6 = 1\\
&\quad\lambda_1,\lambda_3,\lambda_4,\lambda_6\geqslant 0.
\end{align}
This has optimal solution $\lambda_6=1$ with objective value $\frac{116}{11}$, corresponding to the optimal basic feasible solution in the original LP with the last two constraints binding.