Is it right to say that projection operator is not self-adjoint(Hermitian) if it is not orthogonal projection operator?
Asked
Active
Viewed 845 times
1
-
Thanks for asking, I think both of us can learn from Robert answer – feriob Dec 08 '19 at 06:35
1 Answers
0
A projection operator $P$ is by definition orthogonal if and only if
$\langle Px, y \rangle = \langle x, Py \rangle \tag 1$
for all vectors $x$, $y$; if (1) binds then
$\langle Px, y \rangle = \langle x, Py \rangle = \langle P^\dagger x, y \rangle, \tag 2$
whence
$Px = P^\dagger x, \tag 3$
or
$P = P^\dagger, \tag 4$
that is, $P$ is self-adjoint. The argument may be reversed: (4) clearly implies (3); thus
$\langle Px, y \rangle = \langle P^\dagger x, y \rangle = \langle x, Py \rangle, \tag 5$
so $P$ is orthogonal.
Since we have shown that a projection operator is orthogonal if and only if it is self-adjoint, we conclude that if $P$ is not orthognonal, then $P$ is not self-adjoint.
Robert Lewis
- 71,180