The equation
$$\lim_{h\to0} \big( f(x+h)-f(x) \big) = 0 \tag{1}$$
says that the distance between $f(x+h)-f(x)$ and $0$ is small as $h$ is sufficiently close to $0$. More formally, given an arbitrary $\varepsilon>0$,
$$\big|\big( f(x+h)-f(x) \big)-0 \big| < \varepsilon \quad \textrm{as } h\in(-\delta,\delta) \tag{2}$$
for some $\delta>0$. Here, you should be interpret $|x-y|$ as the distance between two real numbers $x$ and $y$. That is, $(2)$ says that the distance between $f(x+h)-f(x)$ and $0$ is less than $\varepsilon$, for every $\varepsilon$ as you want, whenever $h$ is in some open neighborhood of $0$.
Also, the equation
$$\lim_{h\to0} f(x+h) = f(x) \tag{3}$$
says that, for every $\varepsilon >0$, the distance between $f(x+h)$ and $f(x)$ is less than $\varepsilon$ whenever $h$ is in some neighborhood of $0$, that is,
$$|f(x+h)-f(x)| < \varepsilon \textrm{ whenever } h\in(-\delta,\delta) \tag{4}$$
for some $\delta > 0$. Of course, there are no difference between $(2)$ and $(4)$ since
$$|f(x+h)-f(x)| = \big|\big( f(x+h)-f(x) \big)-0 \big|.$$
So, in fact, $(1)$ and $(3)$ they say exactly the same, in other words, they are equivalent.