You are correct that for any ring $R$,
$$R/I\text{ is a field} \iff I \text{ is maximal}\implies I\text{ is prime}.$$
It is not in general true that
$$I\text{ is maximal}\impliedby I\text{ is prime}.$$
The corresponding characterization of prime ideals is
$$R/I\text{ is a domain}\iff I\text{ is prime}.$$
Hint for the problem: The ring $F[x]$ is a principal ideal domain. That is,
every ideal of $F[x]$ is principal; in other words, for any ideal $I$, there is an $f$ such that
$$I=(f)=\{f\cdot g\mid g\in F[x]\}.$$
$F[x]$ is a domain; in other words, if neither of $f,g\in F[x]$ are the zero polynomial, then $fg\neq 0$.
Now characterize when $I$ is prime in terms of properties of how $f$ factors (remember, every polynomial in $F[x]$ factors into irreducibles). In any ring every maximal ideal is prime, but the converse is not true. In the case of $F[x]$, there will be exactly one prime ideal that is not maximal. Here is a hint for what it is: the ring $F[x]$ is not a field.