(1) If $y \in S$, then $\langle x, y \rangle \leq 1$ will be held for any $x \in S^{\circ}$.
Obviously, we have $y \in S^{\circ\circ}$.
Thus $S \subseteq S^{\circ\circ}$.
(2) If $y \in S^{\circ\circ}$, then $\langle x, y \rangle \leq 1$ still will be held for any $x \in S^{\circ}$. we can prove by contradiction.
Suppose $y \notin S$, since $S$ is closed and convex set, we can find a hyperplane $\{x \mid \langle a, x \rangle = b\}$ that separate the point $y$ and $S$ strongly.
In other words, we can find $a \in \mathbb{R}^n, b \in R$ such that
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
& \langle a, s \rangle \leq b, \quad \forall s \in S. \\
& \langle a, y \rangle > b
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Thus, we can find a vector $\bar{a} = \frac{a}{b}$ such that $\bar{a} \in S^{\circ}$, but $\langle \bar{a},y \rangle > 1$. So contradiction. Thus $S^{\circ\circ} \subseteq S$.
By the way, the set $S^{\circ}$ is called the polar of $S$. And one can refer an alternative proof based on gauge function and support function in Rockafaller's book ``Convex Analysis'' (Chapter 14).