In your list, the terms which appear are the following:
$$
y,\quad A = λy·y,\quad v,\quad B = λv·v,\quad w,\quad C_w = B w,\\
D = λw·C_w,\quad E = A D,\quad F = λx·E,\quad G = F E,\quad u,\quad H_u = λx·u,\\
I_u = H_u u,\quad J = λu·I_u,\quad K = A B,\quad L = J K,\quad M = λx·B,\quad N = M B.
$$
Your numbered expressions are, respectively, $G$, $E$, $D$, $L$ and $N$. The terms which are variables are:
$$y,\quad x,\quad w,\quad u.$$
The terms which are lambda-abstractions are:
$$
A = λy·y,\quad B = λv·v,\quad D = λw·C_w,\quad F = λx·E,\\
H_u = λx·u,\quad J = λu·I_u,\quad M = λx·B.
$$
The terms which are applications are
$$C_w = B w,\quad E = A D,\quad G = F E,\quad I_u = H_u u,\quad K = A B,\quad L = J K,\quad N = M B.
$$
An application whose first subterm is a lambda abstraction is a redex. All of the applications listed are of this form and are, therefore, redexes. Under β-reduction:
$$
C_w = (λv·v) w → w,\quad
E = (λy·y) D → D,\quad
G = (λx·E) E → E,\quad
I_u = (λx·u) u → u,\\
K = (λy·y) B → B,\quad
L = (λu·I_u) K → I_K,\quad
N = (λx·B) B → B.
$$
Thus,
$$C_w → w,\quad G → E → D,\quad L → I_K → K → B,\quad N → B.$$
The lambda abstractions reduce underneath their respective lambdas to:
$$D = λw·C_w → λw·w,\quad F = λx·E → λx·D,\quad J = λu·I_u → λu·u.$$
The others are all already in normal form. Thus, defining $O = λw·w$, we have:
$$G → D → O,\quad E → D → O,\quad D → O,\quad L → I_K → K → B,\quad N → B.$$
Finally, under α-equivalence, $A ≡ B ≡ O$.