2

Given two positive rational number $a,b$. How to show that almost surely Brownian motion attains a local maximum at some time in $(a,b)$?

saz
  • 120,083
Prob
  • 141
  • I'm actually what to prove that the set of times at which Brownian motion attains a local maximum is dense in (0,∞). So, I think I should probably prove this first. I try to apply Markov property here, but I don't know how should I do it. – Prob Apr 17 '13 at 01:36

2 Answers2

3

From Bluemental's 0-1 law and the symmetry of the Brownian motion we can see that for $B_0=0$ almost surely there $t_n \rightarrow 0$ and $s_n\rightarrow 0$ such that $B_{t_n}>0$ and $B_{s_n}<0$. We choose $0<t_m<s_k$.

Now on the interval $[0,s_k]$, $B_t$ cannot attain its maximum on the boundary hence it is somewhere in the interior, which gives exactly the existence of a local minimum.

clark
  • 15,327
3

Without loss of generality, we can assume $a=0$ (since the process $W_t := B_{t+a}-B_a$ is again a Brownian motion). Denote by $\Omega_{\max}$ the set of $w \in \Omega$ such that the path $(0,b) \ni t \mapsto B_t(w)$ does not attain a local maximum in $(0,b)$.

Let $w \in \Omega_{\max}$. Since the Brownian motion has continuous paths there are two possibilities:

  • $(0,b) \ni t \mapsto B_t(w)$ does not attain a local minimum. This implies the monotonicity of the mapping.
  • $(0,b) \ni t \mapsto B_t(w)$ does attain a local minimum. In this case, we can find a partition $0=s_0<\ldots<s_n=b$ such that $B_{\cdot}(w)|_{[s_{j-1},s_j]}$ is monotone for $j=1,\ldots,n$.

Thus, we conclude that the path is of bounded variation, i.e. $$\text{VAR}(B_{\cdot}(w),b) := \sup_{\Pi} \sum_{t_j-t_{j-1} \in \Pi} |B_{t_j}(w)-B_{t_{j-1}}(w)| \leq \sum_{j=1}^m |B_{s_j}(w)-B_{s_{j-1}}(w)| < \infty$$ where the supremum is taken over partitions $\Pi=\{0=t_0<\ldots<t_m=b\}$.

On the other hand, it is known that the total variation $\text{VAR}(B_{\cdot},b)$ is equal to $\infty$ a.s., so we conclude $\mathbb{P}(\Omega_{\max})=0$.

saz
  • 120,083
  • 1
    Is it necessary two consider a partition finer than $0 = s_0 < s_1 < s_2 = b$? I'd think "no", because due to the absence of a local maximum, the continuous $t \mapsto B_t(\omega)$ has at most one local minimum in $(0,b)$ and should hence be monotone on $(s_0,s_1)$ and $(s_1,s_2)$ with $s_1$ being the position of local minimum (?) – PDEprobabilist Apr 23 '20 at 10:23