2

I'd like some heavy critique if you don't mind. See here for more details.

Let $S=\{f \in P_n(F) : f(1)=0\}$. Clearly, the polynomial $f(x)=0 \in S$ because $f(c)=0$ for any choice of $c\in F$. To demonstrate closure under addition and multiplication consider the fact that $cf(1)+g(1)=c\cdot 0+0=(cf+g)(1)=0$ for $f,g\in S$. To find dimension of $P_n(F)$, consider the linear transformation $T:P_n \rightarrow F$ defined by $T(f(x))=f(1)$, namely evaluating a polynomial at $1$ is a linear transformation from $P_n$ to $F$: \begin{eqnarray} T(f(x)+cg(x))=T(f(x))+cT(g(x))=f(1)+cg(1) \end{eqnarray} Thus, $S$ is the null space of $T$, and from Lemma 1 and Lemma 2 (don't worry about these) we see that \begin{eqnarray} \dim R(T) + \dim N(T) = \dim P_n(F) \leadsto 1 + \dim N(T) = n+1 \leadsto \dim N(T) = n \end{eqnarray}

Trancot
  • 4,021

2 Answers2

1

Yes, your proof is correct. But the first part is superfluous. Define $T: P_n(F)\to F$ by $f\mapsto f(1)$. In your question you checked that $T$ is linear. Then as you noted, $S$ is the null space (sometimes also called kernel) of $T$. As the null space of a linear map it is thus a subspace of $P_n(F)$.

0

Yes, your proof is correct. Alternatively, note that $\{1 - x, 1 - x^2, \dots , 1 - x^n\} \subseteq S$ is linearly independent. Since it's clear that $S \ne P_n(F)$, it follows that $\dim S = n$.

Ink
  • 5,126