3

I'd like to show that there exists an embedding $P^m \times P^n \to P^{(m+1)(n+1)-1}$, where $P^i$ denotes the real projective space.

I found the Segre map

$$\Sigma_{m,n}:P^m \times P^n \to P^{(m+1)(n+1)-1}$$ $$[x_0:\cdots: x_m] \times [y_0:\cdots:y_n] \to [x_0y_0: x_0y_1: \cdots: x_iy_j:\cdots: x_my_n].$$ We define $[z_{00}:z_{01}:\cdots:z_{ij}:\cdots:z_{mn}]:= [x_0y_0: x_0y_1: \cdots: x_iy_j:\cdots: x_my_n]$ for $[x_0:\cdots: x_m] \times [y_0:\cdots:y_n]\in P^m \times P^n$. It is easy to see the image in matrix form \begin{equation*} \begin{bmatrix} z_{00} & \cdots & z_{0n} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\ z_{m0} & \cdots & z_{mn} \end {bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} x_{0} \\ \vdots \\ x_{m} \end {bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} y_{0}: \cdots : y_{n} \end {bmatrix}. \end{equation*}

Let $z=[z_{00}:z_{01}:\cdots:z_{ij}:\cdots:z_{mn}]$ be an element of the image of $\Sigma_{m,n}$ and let $(a,b)\in P^m \times P^n$ such that $\Sigma_{m,n}(a,b)=z$. WLOG we can assume $a_0=b_0=z_{00}=1$. then $b_j=z_{0j}$ for all $0\leq j \leq n$ and $a_i=z_{i0}$ so $a,b$ are uniquely determined and this map is bijective onto the image.

Is this enough to conclude that we have an embedding? Is $(m+1)(n+1)-1$ the smallest number for which we can have an embedding of $P^m\times P^n$?

mandella
  • 1,852

1 Answers1

7

Being bijective is not enough to be an embedding, but what you've done is: You have constructed an inverse morphism from $\Sigma_{m,n}$ to $\mathbb{P}^m \times \mathbb{P}^n$, showing that the Segre map is an isomorphism onto its image, which is what it means to be an embedding.

No, it is definitely not the smallest number. It is a general fact that you can embed any smooth $n$-dimensional projective variety $X$ into $\mathbb{P}^{2n+1}$. The idea is you take an embedding into some high dimensional projective space and then repeatedly project down to hyperplanes, one dimension at a time. As long as the point you project from doesn't lie on any secant or tangent line of $X$, this will continue to be an embedding.

nkm
  • 2,466
  • 10
  • 17
  • So for example $P^m \times P^n$ could be embedded to $P^{2n+1}$ by what embedding? – mandella May 20 '20 at 08:52
  • 1
    No, $\mathbb{P}^m \times \mathbb{P}^n$ could be embedded into $\mathbb{P}^{2n+2m+1}$, by picking any $2n+2m+2$ generic bihomogeneous degree 1,1 polynomials in the $a_i$ and $b_j$. – nkm May 20 '20 at 08:54
  • Ok, thank you. Is there any literature you know of about this topic? I would like to see a bit more explanations. – mandella May 20 '20 at 08:56
  • 1
    This should be in most introductory algebraic geometry textbooks. For one, it's in Shafarevich's Basic Algebraic Geometry 1, chapter II, section 5.4. – nkm May 20 '20 at 09:07
  • 2
    +1, this is a nice explanation. One nitpick: your statement about a variety of dimension $n$ embedding in to $\Bbb P^{2n+1}$ is not quite correct. You should require that the variety be smooth, otherwise there are counterexamples (pick a projective variety of dimension $n$ with a tangent space at some point of dimension at least $2n+2$, for instance). – KReiser May 21 '20 at 22:40
  • Good point, I'll fix that. Thank you – nkm May 22 '20 at 00:38