In one direction, if $x \in A \cup A^{'}$ then either $x \in A$ or $x \in A^{'}$ .
. If $x \in A \implies x \in \overline{A} $ (trivially).
. If $x \in A^{'}$, by the definition of a limit point, every neighborhood of $x$ intersects $A$ in a point different from $x$. Because their intersections are non empty, $x \in \overline{A}$ by definition.
In the other direction, if $ x \in \overline{A}$ then either $x \in A$ or $x \notin A $ (more specifically $x\in \overline{A} \backslash A$). Now,
. Suppose $ x \in A $. Then certainly $ x \in A \cup A^{'}$
. Now suppose $x \notin A. $ We are given that $ x \in \overline{A}.$ By the definition of a closure of a set, all neighborhoods of $x$ must intersect $A$. Now we have that these intersections are non empty and $x \notin A,$ so both of these imply that these neighborhoods MUST intersect $A$ at some other (different) point(s) of $A$, which is exactly the definition of a limit point. Therefore $x \in A{'}$ and finally $ \implies x \in A \cup A^{'}.$