Suppose it's possible. Call $S=\{x_0,...,x_{37}\}$ such a solution.
Then split $[0;60]$ in intervals of length 12, except for the last one.
$$I_1=[0;12]\quad I_2=[13;25]\quad I_3=[26;38]\quad I_4=[39;41]\quad I_5=[42;54]\quad I_6=[55;60]$$
Then consider the map that sends :
- every $x\in S\cap I_{2k}\quad\quad$ to $\quad x-13\in \bar{S}\cap I_{2k-1} $
- every $x\in S\cap I_{2k-1}\quad $ to $\quad x+13 \in \bar{S}\cap I_{2k} $.
This map is well-defined except for at most $7$ numbers in $I_5$ (those who lie between $48$ and $54$).
This map is injective and by definition $S$ and $f(S)$ are disjoint subsets of $[0;60]$.
But the cardinality of $S\cup f(S)$ is at least $38 + 38-7= 69 > 61$. Contradiction.