Take the following expression:
$\frac{45000cm^3}{1}*\frac{1m^3}{100cm^3}$
This is how I initially solved it:
$\frac{45000}{1}*\frac{1m^3}{100}$
$\frac{45000}{100}*\frac{1m^3}{1}$
$450m^3$
Now, that is obviously wrong. I had assumed that since the cubic in $cm^3$ cancel out that I wouldn't need to raise $100$ to the 3rd power, but I was wrong. Although the cm^3 did cancel out, I still had to raise the 100 to the 3rd power:
$\frac{45000}{1}*\frac{1m^3}{100}$
$\frac{45000}{100^3}*\frac{1m^3}{1}$
$0.045m^3$
Now, my questions:
Why do we still have to raise the 100 to the 3rd power ? I guess I am treating them like normal exponents, but it appears when dealing with units the exponents are treated differently. It appears that $100cm^3$ should in fact be interpreted as $100^3cm^3$.
If the hunch in my first question is valid ($100^3cm^3$) then how come no one writes it like that ? and wouldn't that cause ambiguity ? i.e. not knowing whether a number has already been cubed or not in this case ?
EDIT: Here is the problem for reference: https://youtu.be/b2JCZDeLGF4?t=1174