Let $(X, d)$ be a metric space and $T : X \to X$ be a continuous map that is topologically transitive. The history of topological transitivity is a long one and many authors opt for different and independent definitions. I have given two such definitions below:
Definition 1. For every pair of non-empty open sets $U$ and $V$ in $X$, there is a non-negative integer $n$ such that $f^n(U) \cap V \neq \emptyset$.
Definition 2. There is a point $x \in X$ such that the forward-orbit $\{T^n(x)\}_{n \geq 0}$ is dense in $X$.
My question concerns the hypotheses we can impose on $X$ to guarantee that it is surjection. From previous discussion on the forum, it is known that under Definition 1, $X$ being compact implies that $T$ is surjective. We also have examples (see here or here) of non-compact spaces $X$ with non-surjective topologically transitive maps $T$. My questions are mainly about the case of Definition 2. Specifically,
- Under Definition 2, does there exist a compact metric space $(X, d)$ with non-surjective topological transitive $T$?
- Under Definition 2, does there exist a complete metric space $(X, d)$ with non-surjective topological transitive $T$?
- Under Definition 1, does there exist a complete metric space $(X, d)$ with non-surjective topological transitive $T$?
If such a system exists for (1.), then it would be a system for (2.). The last question is a weakening of hypothesis about the result under Definition 1. Any observations, hints, and answers would be appreciated.
Note: Definition 1 and Definition 2 are equivalent when $(X, d)$ is complete, separable, and contains no isolated points.