I have just started reading Brin and Stuck's book on Dynamical Systems, and I am having trouble interpreting one of the exercises. The problem reads:
Show that the complement of a forward invariant set is backward invariant, and vice versa. Show that if $f$ is bijective, then an invariant set $A$ satisfies $f^t(A) = A$ for all $t$. Show that this is false, in general, if $f$ is not bijective.
I had no trouble with the first part, but I think I must be misinterpreting the second part.
I assume that when they say "$f$ is bijective" they mean that $\forall t: f^t$ is bijective. If this is the case, it appears to me that I have a counterexample to their second claim:
Consider the dynamical system $f^t: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ given by $f^t(x) = x+t$. Then $f$ is bijective, and the set $A = (0, \infty)$ is forward invariant, because $f^t(A) = (t, \infty) \subseteq A$. However, we see that $f(A) \not = A$.
Could anyone please clatify what is going on? Thank you.