0

I am finding a function f which is continuous on a closed interval but not bounded on the interval.

ROBINSON
  • 2,269

3 Answers3

4

Isn't $[0, \infty)$ a closed interval? Then just take $x$ in that case.

blitzer
  • 458
  • 2
  • 3
2

As André stated above, you will not find such a function.

On the one hand, think about what unboundedness on a finite interval means: it means arbitrarily large jumps in a finite interval. No such function can be continuous.

More precisely, there is the Extreme Value Theorem.

1

Well to formalize it a bit, what you're saying is

continuous on a closed interval but not bounded on the interval

The not bounded on closed interval means for some interval $[a,b]$:

$\forall M>0\in\mathbb{R} ,\ \ \exists x_0 \in [a,b] $ so that $ f\left(x_0\right)>M$

But as mixedmath stated according to Extreme Value Theorem:

f is continuous in the closed and bounded interval [a,b], then f must attain its maximum and minimum value, each at least once. That is, there exist numbers $c$ and $d$ in $[a,b]$ such that $\forall x\in [a,b] , f(c)\leq f(x)\leq f(d)$

(courtesy of Wikipedia)

So now we can easily get a contradiction: let's just pick $M=2f(d)$ and try to use the first statement clearly it's a contradiction to the Extreme Value Theorem.

But as blitzer noted correctly it does depend on whether you have to have finite numbers as endpoints. Please read here more on intervals.

Scis
  • 245