To prove this, I decided to start with vertex e, then two cases occur
Case 1: Use d-e-f, delete b-e and e-h at e. Use a-b-c and g-h-i. Delete at d, d-a (prevent subcircuit). Use g-d-e. Then at g, delete n-g and g-l. Use k-n-a and i-l-j. Delete at i, i-k and i-f. Use h-i-l and c-k-n. At a, delete a-j, use n-a-b and c-j-l. Now at c, there are 4 edges incident to c and nothing can be done about it so no hamilton circuit exists.
Case 2: Use b-e-f so at e, delete d-e and e-h. Use a-d-g and g-h-i. So at g, delete g-n and g-l. Use k-n-a and i-l-j. So at i, delete i-f and i-k. Use c-f-e and c-k-n. At a, delete a-j and a-b. Use c-j-l and e-b-c. Now c is required to be incident to 4 vertices and nothing can be done about it so no hamilton circuit exists.
So in both possible cases, no hamilton circuit exists so no hamilton circuit exists.
Is this correct? Is my reasoning okay?
