Let $R$ be a ring (commutative with unit), and let $M$ be an $R$-module. Let $S = R \oplus M$ be made into a ring with the obvious product, where $M^2 = 0$. In Eisenbud's book (Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry), Exercise 16.2 asks to compute $\Omega_{S/R}$, the universal $S$-module of $R$-linear differentials.
The hint in the back of the book says just one short statement with no further explanation: $\Omega_{S/R} = M$. I don't think this is right, although it is easy to check that the projection $S \to M$ is a derivation. If $\Omega_{S/R} = M$, then for any $R$-linear derivation $d : S \to N$, and $m_1, m_2 \in M$, we would have $m_1 dm_2 = 0$. I don't think this relation can be derived.
If I use $m^2 = 0$, I get $m\,dm = 0$ (assuming characteristic $\ne 2$), and if I use $m_1 m_2 = 0$ then I get $m_1 d m_2 + m_2 d m_1 = 0$. No other relations seem derivable in general.
So is this an error in the book?