1

I'm in my first year of uni and we started using double and triple integrals in electrostatics to calculate the areas and volumes of simple shapes such as the cylinder. trying to learn the math behind it I learned about the jacobian and change of variables. now I understand why the triple integral for the volume of a cylinder is what it is since I can use the jacobian to get it from the one in cartesian. $V(R)= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \chi(R)dxdydz$ to $V(R)=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{+\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \chi(R)\rho dzd\rho d\theta$ but the problem is when we calculated the area of the lateral surface of the cylinder in class using cylindrical coordinates. $\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{h}R dzd\theta$ I didn't know what the integral would look like in cartesian, to begin with...I also saw some use the Dirac delta to calculate it in cartesian but I don't know how to manipulate those and I don't know how to transform it to cylindrical, my objective being to prove the use of the integrals the professor used.

QUESTION: can someone show me what the integral for the area of the lateral surface of a cylinder would look like in cartesian? and if it's complicated how to transform it into cylindrical.

1 Answers1

0

Integral in cartesian

One way to find the lateral surface area is to add up the areas of thickened circles of small height like "$\mathrm{d}z$". To do that, we first need the circumference of those circles.

The circumference of a circle $x^{2}+y^{2}=R^{2}$ (at height $z$) doesn't change with height, so we can just work in the $xy$-plane. Then there are two semicircles, one given by $y=\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}$ and the other given by $y=-\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}$. The semicircles each have the same length, so we can just find twice the length of the first one. The arc length formula can be found at Paul's Online Notes or or openstax Calculus Volume 2. We have $\int_{-R}^{R}\sqrt{1+\left(\dfrac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x}\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}\right)^{2}}\,\mathrm{d}x$ for the length of one semicircle, so twice that is the entire circumference.

Then we can multiply these circumferences by a small height $\Delta z$, add them up, and take a limit to turn it into the following integral:

\begin{align*} & \int_{0}^{h}\left(2\int_{-R}^{R}\sqrt{1+\left(\dfrac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x}\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}\right)^{2}}\,\mathrm{d}x\right)\,\mathrm{d}z\\ = & 2\int_{0}^{h}\int_{-R}^{R}\sqrt{1+\left(-\dfrac{x}{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}\right)^{2}}\,\mathrm{d}x\,\mathrm{d}z\\ = & 2\int_{0}^{h}\int_{-R}^{R}\sqrt{1+\dfrac{x^{2}}{R^{2}-x^{2}}}\,\mathrm{d}x\,\mathrm{d}z\\ = & 2\int_{0}^{h}\int_{-R}^{R}\sqrt{\dfrac{R^{2}}{R^{2}-x^{2}}}\,\mathrm{d}x\,\mathrm{d}z\\ = & 2\int_{0}^{h}\int_{-R}^{R}\dfrac{R}{\sqrt{R^{2}-x^{2}}}\,\mathrm{d}x\,\mathrm{d}z\\ = & 2\int_{0}^{h}\int_{-R}^{R}\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-\left(x/R\right)^{2}}}\,\mathrm{d}x\,\mathrm{d}z \end{align*}

Note that the inner $x$ integral doesn't depend on $z$, so we could also write $$ 2\left(\int_{-R}^{R}\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-\left(x/R\right)^{2}}}\,\mathrm{d}x\right)\left(\int_{0}^{h}1\,\mathrm{d}z\right) $$ $$ \text{or }\int_{-R}^{R}\left(\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-\left(x/R\right)^{2}}}2\int_{0}^{h}1\,\mathrm{d}z\right)\,\mathrm{d}x\text{.} $$ The latter suggests a way of thinking of this by cutting slices for each value of $x$, where the $\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-\left(x/R\right)^{2}}}$ accounts for the curve of the semicircle.

Transforming back to cylindrical

To transform back to cylindrical, we can use a trigonometric substitution (openstax, Paul's). We use $x=R\cos\theta$ and $\mathrm{d}x=-R\sin\theta\,\mathrm{d}\theta$ to convert the $x$ integral above:

\begin{align*} & \int_{-R}^{R}\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-\left(x/R\right)^{2}}}\,\mathrm{d}x\\ = & \int_{\theta\text{ when }x=-R}^{\theta\text{ when }x=R}\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-\left(R\cos\theta/R\right)^{2}}}\left(-R\sin\theta\right)\,\mathrm{d}\theta\\ = & \int_{\pi}^{0}\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-\cos^{2}\theta}}\left(-R\sin\theta\right)\,\mathrm{d}\theta\\ = & \int_{\pi}^{0}\dfrac{-R\sin\theta}{\sqrt{\sin^{2}\theta}}\,\mathrm{d}\theta\\ = & \int_{\pi}^{0}\dfrac{-R\sin\theta}{\left|\sin\theta\right|}\,\mathrm{d}\theta\\ = & \int_{\pi}^{0}-R\,\mathrm{d}\theta\text{ since }\sin\theta\ge0\text{ on }[0,\pi]\\ = & \int_{0}^{\pi}R\,\mathrm{d}\theta \end{align*}

This means the entire area becomes $$ 2\left(\int_{0}^{\pi}R\,\mathrm{d}\theta\right)\left(\int_{0}^{h}1\,\mathrm{d}z\right)=\left(\int_{0}^{2\pi}R\,\mathrm{d}\theta\right)\left(\int_{0}^{h}1\,\mathrm{d}z\right)=\boxed{\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{h}R\,\mathrm{d}z\,\mathrm{d}\theta} $$

More general areas

The lateral area of a cylinder is a very special kind of surface, and there are more general techniques we can use to find the area of it and other surfaces.

Areas of revolution

The cylinder is a surface of revolution: For the cylinder under discussion, we revolve the line segment $x=R,y=0,z\in[0,h]$ around the $z$-axis. Rotating things around, this would have the same area as rotating the line segment $x=R$, $y\in[0,h]$ (in the plane $z=0$) around the $y$-axis. The standard formula (Paul's, openstax) for the lateral area of a surface of revolution gives:

\begin{align*} & \int_{0}^{h}2\pi R\sqrt{1+\left(\dfrac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}y}R\right)^{2}}\,\mathrm{d}y\\ = & 2\pi\int_{0}^{h}R\,\mathrm{d}y\\ = & \left(\int_{0}^{2\pi}1\,\mathrm{d}\theta\right)\int_{0}^{h}R\,\mathrm{d}y\\ = & \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{h}R\,\mathrm{d}y\,\mathrm{d}\theta\\ = & \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{h}R\,\mathrm{d}z\,\mathrm{d}\theta \end{align*}

Areas of parametrized surfaces

If you do more calculus (you might not come across this in a first study of electrostatics), you might want to find the surface area of a surface that doesn't have any rotational symmetry, but still has a nice parametrization. This is described at openstax Calculus Volume 3 and Paul's Online Calculus III Notes, for instance.

One thing to watch out for is that if you have something like a Moebius strip which has only one side, you might not be calculating the area you intended. See the Math StackExchange question "Area of Mobius strip" and its answers for some discussion.

Mark S.
  • 23,925
  • thanks for this amazing answer. you are phenomenal. as you said the example is too specific and i did want the full general description you gave. it is as you said the case that i won't come across them anytime soon. it's just that I'm driven by an urge to understand whatever I'm learning to the foundation. after reading your answer i get the feeling starting always from cartesian coordinate system and then transforming the integral is not the way to go (please do tell me if I'm wrong). and again many thanks for your efforts. – Kacem Abd El Aziz Oct 13 '20 at 13:51
  • @KacemAbdElAziz Yes, you're correct. Especially in a course like electrostatics, you should be on the look out for rotational symmetries where cylindrical coordinates or spherical coordinates can help. As you do more with calculus, you might sometimes craft a new substitution to make the domain of integration or the integrand easier to handle. – Mark S. Oct 13 '20 at 18:45