What was I thinking
There is a neighborhood W=$\prod_i (-r_i,r_i)$ that does not intersect A . Consider a linear transformation $h_i:x_i \to x_i/r_i$ (linear transformation is a homeomorphism in both the product and box topology on $\mathbb{R^N}$). Also a product of continuous functions is continuous so, that the product of homeomorphisms is a homeomorphism. If y=h(x) $\in$ V , V is open in the box topology, then there is a basis neighborhood y $\in$ V′=$\prod_i V′_i \subseteq V$ and h(z) $\in$ V′ iff for all i : $h_i(z_i) \in V′_i$ iff for all i : $z_i \in h^{−1}_i(V′_i)$ . Therefore, for all z $\in \prod_i h^{−1}_i(V′_i)$ which is open in the box topology if all $h_i$ are continuous, h(z)$ \in V′ \subseteq V$, it is also true for the linear transformation, and if was possible separate 0 from h(A) by a continuous function f , then $f \circ h$ would separate 0 and A . We Know that h(A) is closed and does not have any points in W′=$\prod_i(−1,1)$ for if it had some than A would have a point in W . We also know that $\mathbb{R^N}_{uniform}$ is completely separable, and there is a continuous function f that separates 0 and X−B(0,1) $ \subseteq $ W′. So, f is continous in the finer box topology as well, and separates 0 from h(A). This way we show that 0 can be separated by a continuous function from a closed set A that does not contain it.
Any comment woud be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.